Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthonysutardja (dyk for supreme court law case) |
imported>SGGH (cmt) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ".... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry". The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 30 October 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
- Did you know that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?
Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ".... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry". The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)