Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc."

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthonysutardja
(dyk for supreme court law case)
 
imported>SGGH
(cmt)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!--Write first comment here, by replacing this line-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ".... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry". The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:45, 30 October 2013

FTC v. Actavis, Inc.

  • Did you know that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?

Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ".... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry". The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)