Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/FTC v. Actavis, Inc."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (One more I missed: fix four dot ellipsis) |
imported>BlueMoonset (needs full review) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like '''ALT1:''' ... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like '''ALT1:''' ... that [[United States Supreme Court]] case '''''[[FTC v. Actavis, Inc.]]''''' challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --[[User:SGGH|S.G.<sup><small>(GH)</small></sup>]] <sub>[[User_talk:SGGH|ping!]]</sub> 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
::*Note: I did some formatting on both hooks, without changing any of the content. [[User:Mandarax|<span style="color:green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></span>]] <span style="color:blue">•</span> [[User talk:Mandarax|<span style="color:#999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</span>]] 19:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ::*Note: I did some formatting on both hooks, without changing any of the content. [[User:Mandarax|<span style="color:green">M<small>AN</small>d<small>ARAX</small></span>]] <span style="color:blue">•</span> [[User talk:Mandarax|<span style="color:#999900"><small>XAЯA</small>b<small>ИA</small>M</span>]] 19:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 2 December 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
FTC v. Actavis, Inc.
- ... that reverse payment settlements of patent litigations are not immune from antitrust liability in the United States?
Created/expanded by EricChuang676 (talk). Nominated by Anthonysutardja (talk) at 16:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
The hook doesn't included the line, perhaps something like ALT1: ... that United States Supreme Court case FTC v. Actavis, Inc. challenged "pay-for-delay" settlements in the drug industry? The original hook is quite long and not the most attention grabbing of all time. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2013 (UTC)