Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Farmdrop"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 5) |
imported>WOSlinker m (fix del tag) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::::– [https://www.countryandtownhouse.co.uk/food-and-drink/a-man-on-a-mission-how-farmdrop-is-fixing-the-food-chain/ This source] states: "...buyers are now being offered better quality and fresher food and local farmers and producers a much fairer financial deal." and "...to provide independent producers with a greater share of the retail price, whilst giving people the best, freshest food, making it a fairer deal for all." — Producers earning a greater share of the retail price, and receiving a fairer financial deal equates to them earning more. They're given more money compared to that received from supermarkets; they're earning more. | ::::– [https://www.countryandtownhouse.co.uk/food-and-drink/a-man-on-a-mission-how-farmdrop-is-fixing-the-food-chain/ This source] states: "...buyers are now being offered better quality and fresher food and local farmers and producers a much fairer financial deal." and "...to provide independent producers with a greater share of the retail price, whilst giving people the best, freshest food, making it a fairer deal for all." — Producers earning a greater share of the retail price, and receiving a fairer financial deal equates to them earning more. They're given more money compared to that received from supermarkets; they're earning more. | ||
::::– I think you're making this much more complex than it actually is. When using Farmdrop, producers are earning more compared to earnings from their products purveyed at supermarkets. It's unclear why you think equal sales volumes via Farmdrop and at supermarkets would be required to confer with increased earnings, or losses for lack of such equality. The sources don't cover your theory, so there's nothing to state about it in the article or in a hook. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 09:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC) | ::::– I think you're making this much more complex than it actually is. When using Farmdrop, producers are earning more compared to earnings from their products purveyed at supermarkets. It's unclear why you think equal sales volumes via Farmdrop and at supermarkets would be required to confer with increased earnings, or losses for lack of such equality. The sources don't cover your theory, so there's nothing to state about it in the article or in a hook. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 09:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | :::::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] <del>[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Revenue and earnings mean two different things. Revenue is what's earned before deducting the cost of goods while earnings is usually understood (though this point, specifically, could be further split) to be net income. The sources refer to revenue, the hook refers to earnings. It may well be that farmers using Farmdrop ''also'' earn more but the sources don't say that and there are so many factors beyond revenue cut that go into calculating earnings I have an issue simply assuming it's true. If it costs me $5 to grow a widget and Farmdrop buys 10 widgets from me for $10 each while Wal-Mart buys 10,000 widgets from me for $6 each, my revenue per unit may be more selling to Farmdrop but I earn more selling to Wal-Mart. However, [[User:Northamerica1000|North America]] is an experienced editor and I AGF the primary hook, assuming no other editor objects, as being a simple case of my personal ignorance on the question. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 14:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)<del> I am amending this approval and recusing myself, without prejudice, due to implications in discussion that my approval of this thread might be personally disadvantageous for me. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 21:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC) | + | :::::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] <del>[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Revenue and earnings mean two different things. Revenue is what's earned before deducting the cost of goods while earnings is usually understood (though this point, specifically, could be further split) to be net income. The sources refer to revenue, the hook refers to earnings. It may well be that farmers using Farmdrop ''also'' earn more but the sources don't say that and there are so many factors beyond revenue cut that go into calculating earnings I have an issue simply assuming it's true. If it costs me $5 to grow a widget and Farmdrop buys 10 widgets from me for $10 each while Wal-Mart buys 10,000 widgets from me for $6 each, my revenue per unit may be more selling to Farmdrop but I earn more selling to Wal-Mart. However, [[User:Northamerica1000|North America]] is an experienced editor and I AGF the primary hook, assuming no other editor objects, as being a simple case of my personal ignorance on the question. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 14:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)</del> I am amending this approval and recusing myself, without prejudice, due to implications in discussion that my approval of this thread might be personally disadvantageous for me. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 21:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC) |
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to give a full review of nomination. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to give a full review of nomination. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:45, 22 November 2018
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Farmdrop
... that Farmdrop saves farmers and fishermen money by eliminating middlemen in the food distribution supply chain?Sources: [1], [2], [3]
- Reviewed: The American Girls Premiere
Created by Northamerica1000 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC).
QPQ done. Article is new and long enough. Hook is of appropriate length and interesting. The only potential issue, Northamerica1000, is I can't see in the three sources cited where it unambiguously states that Farmdrop saves farmers money. The Digital Arts Online source notes that farmers get 70% vs 30% at supermarkets, however, an increase in profit on one line item is not necessarily synonymous with a net saving of money. The hook may not need to be rewritten, and it may be fine; I may just need some personal clarification. LavaBaron (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Re Check out the alt below. North America1000 23:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
- ALT4: ... that farmers and fishermen receive a higher percentage of revenue using Farmdrop because no middlemen are involved in the supply chain?
- :REVIEW COMPLETED - The following review was completed by Esemono
QPQ for Template:Did you know nominations/The American Girls Premiere
Article created by Northamerica1000 on October 31, 2016 and has 1796 characters (288 words) "readable prose size"
NPOV
Hook is interesting and sourced with Refs 4 and 6
Hook is sourced to :By creating Farmdrop ... local farmers and producers (get) a much fairer financial deal
Every paragraph sourced
Earwig @ Toolserver Copyvio Detector found no copyvio
GTG -- Esemono (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)