Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fenestraja plutonia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Noswall59 (emboldening second opinion request) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Second opinion) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | * ... that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]] | + | * ... that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]] of '''[[Fenestraja plutonia|Underworld windowskate]]''' was collected from the [[California]] coast, even though this fish is otherwise found only in the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) | ::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will '''ask for a second opinion''' on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC). | :::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will '''ask for a second opinion''' on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC). | ||
+ | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 09:40, 4 March 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Fenestraja plutonia
- ... that in 1891 a single specimen of Underworld windowskate was collected from the California coast, even though this fish is otherwise found only in the Atlantic?
Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- I'll review this. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- Article: The content is long enough (>3000 characters), new enough (created 2 March), cites sources throughout, doesn't appear to contain copyrighted text.
- Hook: you ought to cite the actual specimen ([1]). The hook is interesting enough and short enough. I am not sure how grammatical this is: "a single specimen, supposedly an Underworld windowskate, was collected". Should it be specimen "of" instead of "an"?
- Other: QPQ checks out. No image used.
Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
- Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. Ryan shell (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)