Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fenestraja plutonia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Second opinion)
imported>Allen3
(to prep5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=March 2015
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 15:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Fenestraja plutonia====
 
====Fenestraja plutonia====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Fenestraja plutonia|Fenestraja plutonia}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Fenestraja plutonia|Fenestraja plutonia}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]] of '''[[Fenestraja plutonia|Underworld windowskate]]''' was collected from the [[California]] coast, even though this fish is otherwise found only in the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]?
 
* ... that in [[1891]] a single [[specimen (biology)|specimen]] of '''[[Fenestraja plutonia|Underworld windowskate]]''' was collected from the [[California]] coast, even though this fish is otherwise found only in the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Fenestraja plutonia|Ryan shell}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[template:Did you know nominations/Luarel Run (Huntington Creek)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[template:Did you know nominations/Luarel Run (Huntington Creek)]]
Line 29: Line 19:
 
::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 
::Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. [[User:Ryan shell|Ryan shell]] ([[User talk:Ryan shell|talk]]) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 
:::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will '''ask for a second opinion''' on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
 
:::Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will '''ask for a second opinion''' on the talk-page. Well done, —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 15:52, 7 March 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 15:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Fenestraja plutonia

Created by Ryan shell (talk). Self nominated at 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC).

I'll review this. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Article: The content is long enough (>3000 characters), new enough (created 2 March), cites sources throughout, doesn't appear to contain copyrighted text.
Hook: you ought to cite the actual specimen ([1]). The hook is interesting enough and short enough. I am not sure how grammatical this is: "a single specimen, supposedly an Underworld windowskate, was collected". Should it be specimen "of" instead of "an"?
Other: QPQ checks out. No image used.
Symbol question.svg Other than the grammar niggle above, this looks ready to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
Tweaked the hook, though i wonder if either could work. Also changed the reference per your suggestion. Ryan shell (talk) 17:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. I think it passes as DYk, but, as this is my first review, I will ask for a second opinion on the talk-page. Well done, —Noswall59 (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC).
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Giving a second opinion; the reviewer has covered the necessary DYK criteria and I agree with the assessment made. I have tweaked the hook for smoother reading and to remove the POV "supposedly". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)