Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/First Congregational Church of Litchfield"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Case
(restore brackets)
imported>Orlady
(comment)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, history and reference verified, even after I fed the hook some irony pills (Full disclosure: I took the picture, although I had no idea it would be used for this article). Hopefully this makes the character count.<p>We could stand to make some further improvements. How about at least writing a proper intro? And using {{tl|infobox religious building}} so we could really show off the picture. But it could go out rough-edged as is. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 06:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, history and reference verified, even after I fed the hook some irony pills (Full disclosure: I took the picture, although I had no idea it would be used for this article). Hopefully this makes the character count.<p>We could stand to make some further improvements. How about at least writing a proper intro? And using {{tl|infobox religious building}} so we could really show off the picture. But it could go out rough-edged as is. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 06:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 +
:::Thanks for the review (and for providing the photo to go with the article). That hook is 210 characters (with spaces -- I believe we count spaces here; or am I remembering wrong?), which is about the same length as the hook I first drafted. I'm also a bit bothered by the two occurrences of "said." For the record, my original hook was: ... that the '''[[First Congregational Church of Litchfield]]''' ''(pictured)'' in Connecticut, now regarded as an iconic New England church, was replaced in the 1870s after it was said to have "not a single line or feature ... suggesting taste or beauty"? By the time I posted the nomination, I had trimmed my hook back to: ... that the '''[[First Congregational Church of Litchfield]]''' ''(pictured)'', now regarded as iconic, was replaced in 1873 after being said to have "not a single line or feature ... suggesting taste or beauty"? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] ([[User talk:Orlady|talk]]) 15:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
  
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:03, 27 January 2012

First Congregational Church of Litchfield

First Congregational Church of Litchfield

Created/expanded by Orlady (talk). Self nom at 01:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Length, history and reference verified, even after I fed the hook some irony pills (Full disclosure: I took the picture, although I had no idea it would be used for this article). Hopefully this makes the character count.

    We could stand to make some further improvements. How about at least writing a proper intro? And using {{infobox religious building}} so we could really show off the picture. But it could go out rough-edged as is. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review (and for providing the photo to go with the article). That hook is 210 characters (with spaces -- I believe we count spaces here; or am I remembering wrong?), which is about the same length as the hook I first drafted. I'm also a bit bothered by the two occurrences of "said." For the record, my original hook was: ... that the First Congregational Church of Litchfield (pictured) in Connecticut, now regarded as an iconic New England church, was replaced in the 1870s after it was said to have "not a single line or feature ... suggesting taste or beauty"? By the time I posted the nomination, I had trimmed my hook back to: ... that the First Congregational Church of Litchfield (pictured), now regarded as iconic, was replaced in 1873 after being said to have "not a single line or feature ... suggesting taste or beauty"? --Orlady (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)