Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Five Fingers of Tibet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>LittleT889 |
imported>MarkH21 (comment on hook wording) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|sign = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)<!---Your signature. Generally, can be left as is---> | |sign = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)<!---Your signature. Generally, can be left as is---> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | }} |
| + | |||
| + | *'''Comment''': The hooks should attribute the strategy to [[Mao Zedong]], since all literature on the subject attributes it to him in the 1940s. Any discussion about it in the modern context acknowledges that there are only hypothetical concerns about it still being relevant. It's more a strategy of Mao than a {{tq|Chinese strategy}}, just like one wouldn't write in a hook that [[Blitzkrieg]] is a {{tq|German strategy}}. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 00:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:42, 27 June 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Five Fingers of Tibet
- ... that the Chinese strategy of Five Fingers of Tibet considers Tibet to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, and Arunachal Pradesh that must be "liberated"? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that the ongoing China–India skirmishes have been linked with the Chinese strategy of Five Fingers of Tibet? Source: [2][3][4]
Created by SignificantPBD (talk). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Comment: The hooks should attribute the strategy to Mao Zedong, since all literature on the subject attributes it to him in the 1940s. Any discussion about it in the modern context acknowledges that there are only hypothetical concerns about it still being relevant. It's more a strategy of Mao than a Template:Tq, just like one wouldn't write in a hook that Blitzkrieg is a Template:Tq. — MarkH21talk 00:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)