Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Five Fingers of Tibet"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SignificantPBD
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 6)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;10:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Five Fingers of Tibet}}
 
{{DYK header|Five Fingers of Tibet}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Five Fingers of Tibet|Five Fingers of Tibet}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Five Fingers of Tibet|Five Fingers of Tibet}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the Chinese policy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]''' considers [[Tibet]] to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: [[Ladakh]], [[Nepal]], [[Sikkim]], [[Bhutan]], and [[Arunachal Pradesh]] that must be "liberated"? <small>Source: [https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/history-the-stand-off-and-policy-worth-rereading/article31854822.ece]</small>
 
* ... that the Chinese policy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]''' considers [[Tibet]] to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: [[Ladakh]], [[Nepal]], [[Sikkim]], [[Bhutan]], and [[Arunachal Pradesh]] that must be "liberated"? <small>Source: [https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/history-the-stand-off-and-policy-worth-rereading/article31854822.ece]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the ongoing [[2020 China–India skirmishes|China–India skirmishes]] have been linked with the [[China|Chinese]] strategy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]'''? <small>Source: [https://www.news18.com/news/india/ladakh-is-the-first-finger-china-is-coming-after-all-five-tibet-chiefs-warning-to-india-2675887.html][https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/resolve-and-prudence-india-china-border-dispute-galwan-valley-ladakh-6462309/][https://theprint.in/opinion/70-yrs-on-indias-tibet-dilemma-remains-but-4-ways-modi-can-achieve-what-nehru-couldnt/440055/]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the ongoing [[2020 China–India skirmishes|China–India skirmishes]] have been linked with the [[China|Chinese]] strategy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]'''? <small>Source: [https://www.news18.com/news/india/ladakh-is-the-first-finger-china-is-coming-after-all-five-tibet-chiefs-warning-to-india-2675887.html][https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/resolve-and-prudence-india-china-border-dispute-galwan-valley-ladakh-6462309/][https://theprint.in/opinion/70-yrs-on-indias-tibet-dilemma-remains-but-4-ways-modi-can-achieve-what-nehru-couldnt/440055/]</small>
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created by [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Five Fingers of Tibet|SignificantPBD|subpage=Five Fingers of Tibet}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* {{DYK checklist
 
:* {{DYK checklist
Line 23: Line 15:
 
|newness      = y
 
|newness      = y
 
|length      = y
 
|length      = y
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
+
|eligibilityother =  
 
|sourced      = y
 
|sourced      = y
 
|neutral      = y
 
|neutral      = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
+
|policyother  =  
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookinterest = y
 
|hookinterest = y
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
+
|hookother    =  
 
|picfree      = NA
 
|picfree      = NA
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picused      =  
|picclear    = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picclear    =  
 
|qpq          = NA
 
|qpq          = NA
 
|status      = y
 
|status      = y
 
|comments    = Interesting. Both ALT0 and ALT1 fine, favoring ALT0.
 
|comments    = Interesting. Both ALT0 and ALT1 fine, favoring ALT0.
|sign        = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
+
|sign        = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 43: Line 35:
 
::I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 
::I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 
:::It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 
:::It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
::::That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
+
::::That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 10:46, 7 July 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Five Fingers of Tibet

Created by SignificantPBD (talk). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
  • Comment: The hooks should attribute the strategy to Mao Zedong, since all literature on the subject attributes it to him in the 1940s. Any discussion about it in the modern context acknowledges that there are only hypothetical concerns about it still being relevant. It's more a strategy of Mao than a Template:Tq, just like one wouldn't write in a hook that Blitzkrieg is a Template:Tq. — MarkH21talk 00:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. SignificantPBD (talk) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — MarkH21talk 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". SignificantPBD (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)