Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Five Fingers of Tibet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SignificantPBD |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 6) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Five Fingers of Tibet}} | {{DYK header|Five Fingers of Tibet}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Five Fingers of Tibet|Five Fingers of Tibet}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Five Fingers of Tibet|Five Fingers of Tibet}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that the Chinese policy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]''' considers [[Tibet]] to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: [[Ladakh]], [[Nepal]], [[Sikkim]], [[Bhutan]], and [[Arunachal Pradesh]] that must be "liberated"? <small>Source: [https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/history-the-stand-off-and-policy-worth-rereading/article31854822.ece]</small> | * ... that the Chinese policy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]''' considers [[Tibet]] to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: [[Ladakh]], [[Nepal]], [[Sikkim]], [[Bhutan]], and [[Arunachal Pradesh]] that must be "liberated"? <small>Source: [https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/history-the-stand-off-and-policy-worth-rereading/article31854822.ece]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that the ongoing [[2020 China–India skirmishes|China–India skirmishes]] have been linked with the [[China|Chinese]] strategy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]'''? <small>Source: [https://www.news18.com/news/india/ladakh-is-the-first-finger-china-is-coming-after-all-five-tibet-chiefs-warning-to-india-2675887.html][https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/resolve-and-prudence-india-china-border-dispute-galwan-valley-ladakh-6462309/][https://theprint.in/opinion/70-yrs-on-indias-tibet-dilemma-remains-but-4-ways-modi-can-achieve-what-nehru-couldnt/440055/]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that the ongoing [[2020 China–India skirmishes|China–India skirmishes]] have been linked with the [[China|Chinese]] strategy of '''[[Five Fingers of Tibet]]'''? <small>Source: [https://www.news18.com/news/india/ladakh-is-the-first-finger-china-is-coming-after-all-five-tibet-chiefs-warning-to-india-2675887.html][https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/resolve-and-prudence-india-china-border-dispute-galwan-valley-ladakh-6462309/][https://theprint.in/opinion/70-yrs-on-indias-tibet-dilemma-remains-but-4-ways-modi-can-achieve-what-nehru-couldnt/440055/]</small> | ||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created by [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* {{DYK checklist | :* {{DYK checklist | ||
Line 23: | Line 15: | ||
|newness = y | |newness = y | ||
|length = y | |length = y | ||
− | |eligibilityother = | + | |eligibilityother = |
|sourced = y | |sourced = y | ||
|neutral = y | |neutral = y | ||
|plagiarismfree = y | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
− | |policyother = | + | |policyother = |
|hookcited = y | |hookcited = y | ||
|hookinterest = y | |hookinterest = y | ||
− | |hookother = | + | |hookother = |
|picfree = NA | |picfree = NA | ||
− | |picused = | + | |picused = |
− | |picclear = | + | |picclear = |
|qpq = NA | |qpq = NA | ||
|status = y | |status = y | ||
|comments = Interesting. Both ALT0 and ALT1 fine, favoring ALT0. | |comments = Interesting. Both ALT0 and ALT1 fine, favoring ALT0. | ||
− | |sign = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC) | + | |sign = [[User:LittleT889|LittleT889]] ([[User talk:LittleT889|talk]]) 20:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC) |
}} | }} | ||
Line 43: | Line 35: | ||
::I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC) | ::I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC) | :::It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
− | ::::That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC) | + | ::::That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". [[User:SignificantPBD|SignificantPBD]] ([[User talk:SignificantPBD|talk]]) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 7 July 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Five Fingers of Tibet
- ... that the Chinese policy of Five Fingers of Tibet considers Tibet to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers: Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, and Arunachal Pradesh that must be "liberated"? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that the ongoing China–India skirmishes have been linked with the Chinese strategy of Five Fingers of Tibet? Source: [2][3][4]
Created by SignificantPBD (talk). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 June 2020 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Comment: The hooks should attribute the strategy to Mao Zedong, since all literature on the subject attributes it to him in the 1940s. Any discussion about it in the modern context acknowledges that there are only hypothetical concerns about it still being relevant. It's more a strategy of Mao than a Template:Tq, just like one wouldn't write in a hook that Blitzkrieg is a Template:Tq. — MarkH21talk 00:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. SignificantPBD (talk) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — MarkH21talk 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's true. Whether or not this policy continues to be a guiding factor in Chinese foreign doctrine is a matter for debate. But there are ample sources to confirm that it is indeed a Chinese policy. I have also changed the word strategy to a seemingly more neutral one, "policy". SignificantPBD (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- It’s not known if it’s still used by China, so it’s a meaningful comparison. It’s only speculation whether it still exists in China. — MarkH21talk 21:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have given a detailed response on the talk page. In the case of Blitzkrieg, it was invented by the Germans but it isn't used by them anymore. Whereas it is not known if the "five fingers" strategy has been discontinued by the Chinese. Hence it is wrong to compare the two. SignificantPBD (talk) 00:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)