Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Columbus, Ohio"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Footlessmouse
(follow up image)
imported>Mandarax
m (mv the "Please do not write below this line" line below what was written below it)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* {{DYKmake|Flag of Columbus, Ohio|Jordano53|subpage=Flag of Columbus, Ohio}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Flag of Columbus, Ohio|Jordano53|subpage=Flag of Columbus, Ohio}}
 
-->
 
-->
 
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
 
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
  
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was just promoted to GA, is long enough, is not featured in the news, appropriate inline citations given, provides citations for direct quotes. I think that alt 1 is much better than the first, but it is not stated explicitly in the article, can you work it, or a close paraphrasing, into the lead? No dispute templates, remains neutral, and the only plagiarism complaints from turnitin relate to the direct quotes and common phrases, so is good there as well. Overall, I very much support Alt 1 to be included as a DYK, it is interesting and timely. I request you add a close paraphrasing into the lead, though, so as to satisfy all requirements. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was just promoted to GA, is long enough, is not featured in the news, appropriate inline citations given, provides citations for direct quotes. I think that alt 1 is much better than the first, but it is not stated explicitly in the article, can you work it, or a close paraphrasing, into the lead? No dispute templates, remains neutral, and the only plagiarism complaints from turnitin relate to the direct quotes and common phrases, so is good there as well. Overall, I very much support Alt 1 to be included as a DYK, it is interesting and timely. I request you add a close paraphrasing into the lead, though, so as to satisfy all requirements. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 24:
 
* I am marking as DKY ready. Although I believe the statement should be worked into the lead, the information is already in the article; it is just phrased in a different way, so I believe it still qualifies. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 
* I am marking as DKY ready. Although I believe the statement should be worked into the lead, the information is already in the article; it is just phrased in a different way, so I believe it still qualifies. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 
* Sorry, this is my first review, I forgot to mention the image is free from copyright restrictions, is highly relevant, appears in the article, and is high-enough quality. No alt is given, you may fix this as well, but considering the entire article serves as alt text for it, it does not seem as relevant as it is for most images.[[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 
* Sorry, this is my first review, I forgot to mention the image is free from copyright restrictions, is highly relevant, appears in the article, and is high-enough quality. No alt is given, you may fix this as well, but considering the entire article serves as alt text for it, it does not seem as relevant as it is for most images.[[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 +
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:40, 17 October 2020

Flag of Columbus, Ohio

Current flag of Columbus, Ohio
Current flag of Columbus, Ohio

Improved to Good Article status by Jordano53 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC).

Symbol confirmed.svg Article was just promoted to GA, is long enough, is not featured in the news, appropriate inline citations given, provides citations for direct quotes. I think that alt 1 is much better than the first, but it is not stated explicitly in the article, can you work it, or a close paraphrasing, into the lead? No dispute templates, remains neutral, and the only plagiarism complaints from turnitin relate to the direct quotes and common phrases, so is good there as well. Overall, I very much support Alt 1 to be included as a DYK, it is interesting and timely. I request you add a close paraphrasing into the lead, though, so as to satisfy all requirements. Footlessmouse (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

  • I am marking as DKY ready. Although I believe the statement should be worked into the lead, the information is already in the article; it is just phrased in a different way, so I believe it still qualifies. Footlessmouse (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry, this is my first review, I forgot to mention the image is free from copyright restrictions, is highly relevant, appears in the article, and is high-enough quality. No alt is given, you may fix this as well, but considering the entire article serves as alt text for it, it does not seem as relevant as it is for most images.Footlessmouse (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)