Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Flag of Western Australia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bloom6132 (←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Flag of Western Australia | status = expanded | hook = ... that the direction of the black swan...') |
imported>Dumelow (review) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Bloom6132|Bloom6132]], review follows: 5x expansion confirmed from 16 September; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing from a spot-check on sources; hook fact is interesting and mentioned in the article. I make the suggestion that "by the [[College of Arms]]" be added to the hook (after "identified") for some context but this is not essential; image is excellent, I can't access the image source but the Commons page says it has been released into the public domain by the creator and I am happy to AGF that it was; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 16 September 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Flag of Western Australia
Flag of Western Australia
Flag of Western Australia
- ... that the direction of the black swan on the flag of Western Australia (pictured) was corrected in 1953, even though this issue was identified 17 years before? Source: Encyclopedia Britannica
- Reviewed: Protestant Film Commission
5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC).
- 16px Hi Bloom6132, review follows: 5x expansion confirmed from 16 September; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't pick up any overly close paraphrasing from a spot-check on sources; hook fact is interesting and mentioned in the article. I make the suggestion that "by the College of Arms" be added to the hook (after "identified") for some context but this is not essential; image is excellent, I can't access the image source but the Commons page says it has been released into the public domain by the creator and I am happy to AGF that it was; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
