Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Flat Bastion Magazine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Prioryman (Add note) |
imported>Maile66 (IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | ; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review. | + | ; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews. |
:*<!--Make first comment here--> | :*<!--Make first comment here--> |
Revision as of 13:23, 10 October 2012
Flat Bastion Magazine
- ... that Flat Bastion Magazine in Gibraltar, built by the British in the 19th century to store gunpowder, is now used as a geological research facility and exhibition centre?
Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 00:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
- Review 1
- Article is new enough (moved to mainspace 2 days prior), and big enough. Preliminary check is cited enough. Article is not in itself promotional or biased. Hook is in article and cited. No copyright infringement found. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:15, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Review 2