Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Flushing Meadows–Corona Park"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(reply)
imported>Epicgenius
(re)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
** '''ALT1''':... that New York City's '''[[Flushing Meadows–Corona Park]]''' hosted two [[world's fair]]s?  <small>Source: Same as ALT0</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that New York City's '''[[Flushing Meadows–Corona Park]]''' hosted two [[world's fair]]s?  <small>Source: Same as ALT0</small>
 
** '''ALT2''':... that three structures from the [[1939 New York World's Fair]] in '''[[Flushing Meadows–Corona Park]]''' were retained for the [[1964 New York World's Fair|1964 World's Fair]]? <small>Source: [https://www.nycgovparks.org/sub_your_park/vt_flushing_meadows/presentation/07appendix.pdf APPENDIX - THE HISTORY OF FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK], p. 53. "Three 1939 World’s Fair structures remained"</small>
 
** '''ALT2''':... that three structures from the [[1939 New York World's Fair]] in '''[[Flushing Meadows–Corona Park]]''' were retained for the [[1964 New York World's Fair|1964 World's Fair]]? <small>Source: [https://www.nycgovparks.org/sub_your_park/vt_flushing_meadows/presentation/07appendix.pdf APPENDIX - THE HISTORY OF FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK], p. 53. "Three 1939 World’s Fair structures remained"</small>
:*
+
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mon Yazawin|Mon Yazawin]]
:* ''Comment'': QPQ pending
 
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) and [[User:Tdorante10|Tdorante10]] ([[User talk:Tdorante10|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 17:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) and [[User:Tdorante10|Tdorante10]] ([[User talk:Tdorante10|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 17:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<!--
 
<!--
Line 24: Line 23:
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article was promoted to GA status within the last seven days, is well written and has no copyvio issues (although one link scores high, it seems to be using the Wiki page as a video description). The hooks are supported by the sources included and correctly formatted. Once a QPQ review is provided this is good to go. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 08:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article was promoted to GA status within the last seven days, is well written and has no copyvio issues (although one link scores high, it seems to be using the Wiki page as a video description). The hooks are supported by the sources included and correctly formatted. Once a QPQ review is provided this is good to go. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 08:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::* {{re|Kosack}} Thanks for the review. I will do a QPQ soon, by tomorrow. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::* {{re|Kosack}} Thanks for the review. I will do a QPQ soon, by tomorrow. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 23:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::* {{re|Kosack}} I have completed the review. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 00:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:55, 21 November 2017

Flushing Meadows–Corona Park

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk) and Tdorante10 (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 17:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article was promoted to GA status within the last seven days, is well written and has no copyvio issues (although one link scores high, it seems to be using the Wiki page as a video description). The hooks are supported by the sources included and correctly formatted. Once a QPQ review is provided this is good to go. Kosack (talk) 08:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)