Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fourth Siege of Gibraltar"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>IznoRepeat m (→top: finish up User:IznoBot#Task 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:DYK/Successful nominations|Fourth Siege of Gibraltar]] [[Category:Passed DYK nominations from December 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:DYK/Successful nominations|Fourth Siege of Gibraltar]] [[Category:Passed DYK nominations from December 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | ||
| − | :{{DYKF|11}} '''''<span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span>''' of [[Fourth Siege of Gibraltar]]'s [[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]. '''Please do not modify this page'''. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived '''nomination's''' [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|('''talk''') '''page''']], the nominated '''article's''' [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|('''talk''') '''page''']], or the '''DYK WikiProject's''' [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|('''talk''') '''page''']]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page'''</span> <span style=float:right>See the '''[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]''' for [[WP:ARCHIVE|('''more''')]] information. | + | :{{DYKF|11}} '''''<span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span>''' of [[Fourth Siege of Gibraltar]]'s [[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]. '''Please do not modify this page'''. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived '''nomination's''' [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|('''talk''') '''page''']], the nominated '''article's''' [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|('''talk''') '''page''']], or the '''DYK WikiProject's''' [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|('''talk''') '''page''']]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page'''</span> <span style=float:right>See the '''[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]''' for [[WP:ARCHIVE|('''more''')]] information.</span>''{{clear}} |
The result was: '''promoted''' by — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)<br />}} | The result was: '''promoted''' by — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)<br />}} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:06, 19 October 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Fourth Siege of Gibraltar's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Fourth Siege of Gibraltar
- ... that although the Fourth Siege of Gibraltar ended with Muhammed IV of Granada still in control of Gibraltar, he was assassinated by his nobles who feared that he had converted to Christianity?
Created by Prioryman (talk). Self nom at 00:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
- Review 1:
New enough and long enough. Nice looking article. Image is properly licensed and source checks out. Hook is fine, AGF on offline refs. Interesting article, with an interesting hook. Simon Burchell (talk) 21:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC)