Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Francis X. Talbot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ergo Sum (→Francis X. Talbot: Fix typo) |
imported>Mandarax m (Add space after ellipsis) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting life on good sources, subscription source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I am not enthusiastic about the hook, - some readers may say "who cares?". Anything else? Fighting bias in the Britannica perhaps? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 22:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC) | : [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting life on good sources, subscription source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I am not enthusiastic about the hook, - some readers may say "who cares?". Anything else? Fighting bias in the Britannica perhaps? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 22:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | :: '''ALT1:''' ...that '''[[Francis X. Talbot]]''' reviewed the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' to reduce [[anti-Catholicism|anti-Catholic]] bias? <small>Source: "This led to a program of revision with a view to making the ''Encyclopædia'' more acceptable to Catholics, a work which still goes on."</small> | + | :: '''ALT1:''' ... that '''[[Francis X. Talbot]]''' reviewed the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' to reduce [[anti-Catholicism|anti-Catholic]] bias? <small>Source: "This led to a program of revision with a view to making the ''Encyclopædia'' more acceptable to Catholics, a work which still goes on."</small> |
::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Added an alt hook, although I don't think it's more significant that the original hook. [[User:Ergo Sum|'''<span style="color:#0645AD">Ergo Sum</span>''']] 00:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Added an alt hook, although I don't think it's more significant that the original hook. [[User:Ergo Sum|'''<span style="color:#0645AD">Ergo Sum</span>''']] 00:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::: I moved ALT1 down, to not confuse others about what was added when, and agree, - that shoirt it's not significant. The fact is too lttlefor a name with which we combine nothing, not American, not Jesuit. So let's look at the other once more: the long phrase of what he was one of th early leaders (already clumsy enough) is plain boring for me who - I confess - had never heard of that revival. Is there a link? What can we shorten? Do we even need any time? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | ::: I moved ALT1 down, to not confuse others about what was added when, and agree, - that shoirt it's not significant. The fact is too lttlefor a name with which we combine nothing, not American, not Jesuit. So let's look at the other once more: the long phrase of what he was one of th early leaders (already clumsy enough) is plain boring for me who - I confess - had never heard of that revival. Is there a link? What can we shorten? Do we even need any time? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:39, 29 December 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Francis X. Talbot
- ... that Francis X. Talbot was one of the early leaders of the mid-20th century Catholic literary revival in the United States? Source: "Three of the earliest leaders of the revival—Jesuits Francis X. Talbot, literary editor of America, Daniel A. Lord, national director of the Sodality of the Blessed Virgin and editor of its organ, the Queen's Work, and Calvert Alexander, whose The Catholic Literary Revival (1935) stood as the era's most substantive analysis of the international Catholic literary movement—all revealed qualities of intellectual insecurity, opposition, and Christian vision." (To Promote, Defend, and Redeem: The Catholic Literary Revival and the Cultural Transformation of American Catholicism, 1920–1960, p. 17)
Moved to mainspace by Ergo Sum (talk). Self-nominated at 20:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC).
Interesting life on good sources, subscription source accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I am not enthusiastic about the hook, - some readers may say "who cares?". Anything else? Fighting bias in the Britannica perhaps? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Francis X. Talbot reviewed the Encyclopædia Britannica to reduce anti-Catholic bias? Source: "This led to a program of revision with a view to making the Encyclopædia more acceptable to Catholics, a work which still goes on."
- Template:Ping Added an alt hook, although I don't think it's more significant that the original hook. Ergo Sum 00:28, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I moved ALT1 down, to not confuse others about what was added when, and agree, - that shoirt it's not significant. The fact is too lttlefor a name with which we combine nothing, not American, not Jesuit. So let's look at the other once more: the long phrase of what he was one of th early leaders (already clumsy enough) is plain boring for me who - I confess - had never heard of that revival. Is there a link? What can we shorten? Do we even need any time? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I suppose mid-20th century could be removed. Ergo Sum 15:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- ... and/or Catholic literary revival could be linked, but only if expanded a bit, and his name would be there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don’t know we had an article on that! Excellent. I’ll add Talbot to it. Ergo Sum 21:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- ... and/or Catholic literary revival could be linked, but only if expanded a bit, and his name would be there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I suppose mid-20th century could be removed. Ergo Sum 15:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- I moved ALT1 down, to not confuse others about what was added when, and agree, - that shoirt it's not significant. The fact is too lttlefor a name with which we combine nothing, not American, not Jesuit. So let's look at the other once more: the long phrase of what he was one of th early leaders (already clumsy enough) is plain boring for me who - I confess - had never heard of that revival. Is there a link? What can we shorten? Do we even need any time? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)