Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Fremlin's Brewery"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vivvt
imported>Ritchie333
(close)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=April 2017
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 10:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)<br />
 +
This is clearly past its sell by date. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 10:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Fremlin's Brewery====
 
====Fremlin's Brewery====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Fremlin's Brewery|Fremlin's Brewery}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Fremlin's Brewery|Fremlin's Brewery}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[Fremlin's Brewery]]''' produced bottled beer because the owner didn't like drinking in pubs?  <small>Source: "... set up by a devout Christian, Ralph Fremlin ... He soon sold its ten pubs. He targeted the home trade where he believed the tonic value of his family ales could be enjoyed in moderation. Bottle labels emphasised their purity." Glover, Brian (2013). The Lost Beers & Breweries of Britian. p.50 Amberley Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-445-62049-7</small>
 
* ... that '''[[Fremlin's Brewery]]''' produced bottled beer because the owner didn't like drinking in pubs?  <small>Source: "... set up by a devout Christian, Ralph Fremlin ... He soon sold its ten pubs. He targeted the home trade where he believed the tonic value of his family ales could be enjoyed in moderation. Bottle labels emphasised their purity." Glover, Brian (2013). The Lost Beers & Breweries of Britian. p.50 Amberley Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-445-62049-7</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Candid|Operation Candid]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Candid|Operation Candid]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Ritchie333|Ritchie333]] ([[User talk:Ritchie333|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Fremlin's Brewery|Ritchie333|subpage=Fremlin's Brewery}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, article sourced sufficiently and is well written. QPQ provided and looks okay. {{u|Ritchie333}} the only challenge I see is that the article does not state that he did not like drinking in pubs and that's why he sold the pubs. It states they were sold and that he targeted home drinking, but that is not all the hook claims. [[User:MPJ-DK|'''<span style="background:blue;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">&nbsp;MPJ</span>''']][[User talk:MPJ-DK|<span style="background:red;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">'''-DK'''&nbsp;</span>]] 00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, article sourced sufficiently and is well written. QPQ provided and looks okay. {{u|Ritchie333}} the only challenge I see is that the article does not state that he did not like drinking in pubs and that's why he sold the pubs. It states they were sold and that he targeted home drinking, but that is not all the hook claims. [[User:MPJ-DK|'''<span style="background:blue;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">&nbsp;MPJ</span>''']][[User talk:MPJ-DK|<span style="background:red;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">'''-DK'''&nbsp;</span>]] 00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Line 23: Line 16:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed to determine whether the new sourcing is adequate to support the hook. Thank you. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed to determine whether the new sourcing is adequate to support the hook. Thank you. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
:*By going through all of the sources, I did not find one which support "the owner didn't like drinking in pubs". Rather, it says that the owner did not sell because he found public houses "sinful". We need to align hook to sources. - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="color:#808080;font-size:15px;font-family:'Georgia, serif';font-style: italic;font-weight: bold;">Vivvt</span>]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|<span style="color:#000;font-size:10px;font-weight: bold;">Talk</span>]]) 06:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
+
:*By going through all of the sources, I did not find one which support "the owner didn't like drinking in pubs". Rather, it says that the owner did not sell because he found public houses "sinful". We need to align hook to sources. - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="color:#808080;font-size:15px;font-family:'Georgia, serif';font-style: italic;font-weight: bold;">Vivvt</span>]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|<span style="color:#000;font-size:10px;font-weight: bold;">Talk</span>]]) 06:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 10:43, 14 May 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
This is clearly past its sell by date. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:43, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Fremlin's Brewery

  • ... that Fremlin's Brewery produced bottled beer because the owner didn't like drinking in pubs? Source: "... set up by a devout Christian, Ralph Fremlin ... He soon sold its ten pubs. He targeted the home trade where he believed the tonic value of his family ales could be enjoyed in moderation. Bottle labels emphasised their purity." Glover, Brian (2013). The Lost Beers & Breweries of Britian. p.50 Amberley Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-445-62049-7

Created by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, article sourced sufficiently and is well written. QPQ provided and looks okay. Template:U the only challenge I see is that the article does not state that he did not like drinking in pubs and that's why he sold the pubs. It states they were sold and that he targeted home drinking, but that is not all the hook claims.  MPJ-DK  00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping It might not be obvious from the specific citations, but from reading various sources and the linked website, they all say that Ralph Fremlin did not want to sell to pubs because he thought it was religiously wrong. I've added a sentence to the article clarifying this. This is a lot stronger than simply saying he "didn't like drinking in pubs", but stating the blunt facts is less "hooky" in my view. I can't think of anything else that leaps out particularly as being suitable myself. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Also - No copyright violations or other issues. If you can find a hook that is supported by the article we'd be good to go.  MPJ-DK  00:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to determine whether the new sourcing is adequate to support the hook. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
  • By going through all of the sources, I did not find one which support "the owner didn't like drinking in pubs". Rather, it says that the owner did not sell because he found public houses "sinful". We need to align hook to sources. - Vivvt (Talk) 06:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)