Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Furcifer verrucosus"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492
(to prep 1)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[File:Chameleon in Berenty Madagascar 0001.JPG|100x100px|Furcifer verrucosus]]
 
[[File:Chameleon in Berenty Madagascar 0001.JPG|100x100px|Furcifer verrucosus]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Furcifer verrucosus|warty chameleon]]''' ''(pictured)'' may be [[Cryptic species complex|indistinguishable]] from the [[Malagasy giant chameleon]] in the field?
+
*... that the '''[[Furcifer verrucosus|warty chameleon]]''' ''(pictured)'' may be [[Cryptic species complex|indistinguishable]] from the [[Malagasy giant chameleon]] in the field?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lepiota ananya|Lepiota zalkavritha]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lepiota ananya|Lepiota zalkavritha]]
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Rcej|Rcej]] ([[User talk:Rcej|talk]]) at 12:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Rcej|Rcej]] ([[User talk:Rcej|talk]]) at 12:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)</small>

Latest revision as of 03:09, 6 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Furcifer verrucosus

Furcifer verrucosus

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 12:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough. Hook is interesting and properly sourced in the article with an inline citation. No indication of plagiarism or copyvio. Good to go. --LlamaAl (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)