Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/GRIM test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Smurrayinchester (←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = GRIM test | article2 = | status = new | hook = ... that the '''GRIM test''' revealed mu...') |
imported>David Eppstein (gtg) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, and adequately sourced. QPQ done. Earwig found no copyvio. However, I have serious concerns about the main hook (alleging scientific misconduct at a specific university lab, without an investigation having confirmed this). Given its appearance in ''The Chronicle of Higher Education'', Buzzfeed, and Forbes (see [https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2017/10/02/cornells-food-lab-is-cooking-up-fake-news/2]) I think it can stay in the article, but that's different from putting it on our front page. Alt1 is much more suitable. So, good to go with ALT1 but not with the main hook. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 06:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 06:05, 21 October 2017
DYK toolbox |
---|
GRIM test
- ... that the GRIM test revealed multiple errors in research from the Cornell University Food and Brand Lab? Source: "Anaya, along with Brown and Tim van der Zee, a graduate student at Leiden University, also in the Netherlands, wrote a paper pointing out the 150 or so GRIM inconsistencies in those four Italian-restaurant papers that Wansink co-authored." (link)
- ALT1:... that a GRIM test on a sample of published psychology articles revealed that over half of them contained at least one mathematically impossible result? Source: "Of the articles that we could test with the GRIM technique (N = 71), around half (N = 36) appeared to contain at least one inconsistent mean, and more than 20% (N = 16) contained multiple such inconsistencies." (link)
Created by Smurrayinchester (talk). Self-nominated at 14:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, and adequately sourced. QPQ done. Earwig found no copyvio. However, I have serious concerns about the main hook (alleging scientific misconduct at a specific university lab, without an investigation having confirmed this). Given its appearance in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Buzzfeed, and Forbes (see [1]) I think it can stay in the article, but that's different from putting it on our front page. Alt1 is much more suitable. So, good to go with ALT1 but not with the main hook. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)