Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/George Mills (novel)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Philafrenzy
(comment)
imported>Yoninah
(good to go)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that [[Stanley Elkin]] has won the [[National Book Critics Circle Award]] in fiction for his novels '''''[[George Mills (novel)|George Mills]]''''' and '''''[[Mrs. Ted Bliss]]'''''?  <small>[http://bookcritics.org/awards/past_awards/#1982 All Past National Book Critics Circle Award Winners and Finalists]</small>
+
* ... that [[Stanley Elkin]] won the [[National Book Critics Circle Award]] in fiction for his novels '''''[[George Mills (novel)|George Mills]]''''' (1982) and '''''[[Mrs. Ted Bliss]]''''' (1995)?  <small>[http://bookcritics.org/awards/past_awards/#1982 All Past National Book Critics Circle Award Winners and Finalists]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': <s>TBD</s> [[Template:Did you know nominations/Uthapuram|Uthapuram]] (1/2) <s>TBD</s> [[Template:Did you know nominations/Thrips tabaci|Thrips tabaci]] (2/2)
 
:* ''Reviewed'': <s>TBD</s> [[Template:Did you know nominations/Uthapuram|Uthapuram]] (1/2) <s>TBD</s> [[Template:Did you know nominations/Thrips tabaci|Thrips tabaci]] (2/2)
 
<small>Created by [[User:Vivvt|Vivvt]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Vivvt|Vivvt]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
* {{DYKmake|George Mills (novel)|Vivvt|subpage=George Mills (novel)}}
 
* {{DYKmake|George Mills (novel)|Vivvt|subpage=George Mills (novel)}}
* {{DYKmake|Mrs. Ted Bliss|Vivvt}}
+
* {{DYKmake|Mrs. Ted Bliss|Vivvt|subpage=George Mills (novel)}}
 
-->
 
-->
  
Line 27: Line 27:
 
[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed as {{mention|Philafrenzy}} is not responding to pings and talk page messages. - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="color:#808080;font-size:15px;font-family:'Georgia, serif';font-style: italic;font-weight: bold;">Vivvt</span>]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|<span style="color:#000;font-size:10px;font-weight: bold;">Talk</span>]]) 09:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 
[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed as {{mention|Philafrenzy}} is not responding to pings and talk page messages. - [[User:Vivvt|<span style="color:#808080;font-size:15px;font-family:'Georgia, serif';font-style: italic;font-weight: bold;">Vivvt</span>]] ([[User talk:Vivvt|<span style="color:#000;font-size:10px;font-weight: bold;">Talk</span>]]) 09:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::Sorry, I won't be able to do the second article until next week due to real life commitments. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::Sorry, I won't be able to do the second article until next week due to real life commitments. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I copyedited both articles. In ''George Mills'', I also replaced the nonsensical ''New York Times'' review with a direct quote from the review. Here is a full review of both articles: Both articles nominated on day of creation. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced (no cites are needed in Plot section), no close paraphrasing seen. Hook refs verified and cited inline in both articles. I added the publication dates to the hook. Images that appear in each article are Fair Use. Two QPQs done. Good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:14, 27 March 2017

George Mills (novel), Mrs. Ted Bliss

Created by Vivvt (talk). Self-nominated at 18:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Begin review. No image to review. QPQs stated to be done but appear perfunctory. Tweeked the hook.
George Mills: Article is new enough and long enough. Article is neutral and generally well referenced apart from the plot section which is completely unreferenced. Article is well structured but the quality of the English is poor in places and needs improvement. A book cover could probably be justified under fair use provisions and would add to the visual appeal of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Mrs. Ted Bliss Article is new enough and long enough. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Re I have uploaded non-free book covers for both novels and provided novel as a source to the plot. Please let me know if anything else needs to be done. - Vivvt (Talk) 05:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I will try to finish the review in the next few days. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed as Template:Mention is not responding to pings and talk page messages. - Vivvt (Talk) 09:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I won't be able to do the second article until next week due to real life commitments. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I copyedited both articles. In George Mills, I also replaced the nonsensical New York Times review with a direct quote from the review. Here is a full review of both articles: Both articles nominated on day of creation. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced (no cites are needed in Plot section), no close paraphrasing seen. Hook refs verified and cited inline in both articles. I added the publication dates to the hook. Images that appear in each article are Fair Use. Two QPQs done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)