Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gesomyrmex pulcher"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ViperSnake151 |
imported>Yoninah (ce) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that unlike living species of the genus the extinct ant '''''[[Gesomyrmex pulcher]]''''' ''(pictured)'' is from Germany | + | * ... that unlike living species of the genus, the extinct ant '''''[[Gesomyrmex pulcher]]''''' ''(pictured)'' is from Germany rather than Asia? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Single source, but well-written and long enough. Personally, I think the hook could use some copyediting, though. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 17:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Single source, but well-written and long enough. Personally, I think the hook could use some copyediting, though. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 17:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::*Copyedited hook. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 18:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 28 February 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gesomyrmex pulcher
- ... that unlike living species of the genus, the extinct ant Gesomyrmex pulcher (pictured) is from Germany rather than Asia?
- Reviewed: Apicystis bombi
5x expanded by Kevmin (talk), Gsautter (talk). Nominated by Kevmin (talk) at 16:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC).
- 16px Single source, but well-written and long enough. Personally, I think the hook could use some copyediting, though. ViperSnake151 Talk 17:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
