Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ginbuna"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Umimmak (strange...) |
imported>Glorioussandwich (responding to discussion) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
::::::::{{ping|Umimmak}} Yes it gives me a timeout. [[User:Vincent60030|<span style="color: orange">Vincent</span>]]<sup>[[User:Vincent60030/London Underground|<span style="color: red">LUFan</span>]]</sup> ([[User talk:Vincent60030|talk]]) <small>([[Special:Contributions/Vincent60030|Kenton!]])</small> 14:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC) | ::::::::{{ping|Umimmak}} Yes it gives me a timeout. [[User:Vincent60030|<span style="color: orange">Vincent</span>]]<sup>[[User:Vincent60030/London Underground|<span style="color: red">LUFan</span>]]</sup> ([[User talk:Vincent60030|talk]]) <small>([[Special:Contributions/Vincent60030|Kenton!]])</small> 14:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::{{ping|Vincent60030}} okay thanks. Strange... I wonder if the {{para|doi-access}} should be changed to reflect that not everyone can access it for free without registering or if this is just a temporary issue. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 14:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC) | :::::::::{{ping|Vincent60030}} okay thanks. Strange... I wonder if the {{para|doi-access}} should be changed to reflect that not everyone can access it for free without registering or if this is just a temporary issue. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 14:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::::::{{ping|Vincent60030}}{{ping|Umimmak}}Never intended to give the impression that gynogenesis is the exclusive form of reproduction for this species, some forms of the species definitely reproduce sexually. ref [3] is working fine for me without timing out. Maybe it was a temporary issue? Let me know if there is anything else I can address.[[User:Glorioussandwich|Glorioussandwich]] ([[User talk:Glorioussandwich|talk]]) 18:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 18:30, 30 December 2018
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ginbuna
- Reviewed: NMS Regina Maria
5x expanded by Glorioussandwich (talk). Self-nominated at 04:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC).
- Template:Ping I'll review this one. It passes newness, length, neutrality, and use of citations. QPQ is done.
- harder to check copyright violations without links to any sources (is there a reason you didn't include any DOIs? I'm assuming this is an oversight and will go about adding them.) Will spot check and check image licensing later.
- Hooks are properly formatted. I would suggest explicitly saying that ginbuna is a fish, though, perhaps?
- I think ALT0 is more interesting but I'm also assuming gynogenesis is uncommon.
- Umimmak (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing. I will add DOIs. I added the word fish to ALT1 but couldn't work it into ALT0 without making it sound weird. And yes, gynogenesis is quite uncommon in vertebrates. Glorioussandwich (talk) 02:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I've already added DOIs so you don't need to worry about that. To update the review, image is appropriately licensed, hooks are stated clearly in article with inline citation. No apparent issues with copyright violations with Earwig or spotchecks. And yeah I agree that it's awkward to just put "fish" in ALT0. How do you feel about:
- Template:Strike
- ALT3: ... that some forms of ginbuna carp practice a type of asexual reproduction known as gynogenesis, in which the male sperm contributes no genetic material, but its presence is required for the female to develop eggs?
But overall I approve. Umimmak (talk) 03:18, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I've already added DOIs so you don't need to worry about that. To update the review, image is appropriately licensed, hooks are stated clearly in article with inline citation. No apparent issues with copyright violations with Earwig or spotchecks. And yeah I agree that it's awkward to just put "fish" in ALT0. How do you feel about:
- Both sound good to me, with a slight preference for the flow of ALT3. Glorioussandwich (talk) 03:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Noted, just for the benefit of whoever adds it to the queue, I've struck out the other alts. Umimmak (talk) 03:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I have come across to promote but one source is a deadlink and the other gives me a time out. Could you find another url replacement or something Template:Ping? VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 08:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping ref [3]’s DOI just worked for me and while the DOI for [12] seems to be dead atm, the [URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2002.00528.x] still works. Typically the URL is redundant with the doi but I guess it could be added alongside
|url-access=subscription
and|doi-broken-date=
. Not sure what Template:U wants to do, though. Umimmak (talk) 13:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)- Template:Replyto I checked the first reference it doesn’t exclusively say they carry out this sort of reproduction. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 13:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- I’m confused, isn’t this sufficient? Template:Tq Neither the hook nor the arcticle say this is the exclusive form of reproduction they engage in. Umimmak (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Replyto oops I think
my mobile browser didn't show the resultsI don't have access to the full version. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 13:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)- Template:Ping but ref [3] isn't paywalled? Hence the
|doi-access-free=
. Umimmak (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2018 (UTC)- Template:Ping looks like I need to register VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Just to clarify you can't see this PDF? I realized there might be confusion because there are two references being discussed. Umimmak (talk) 14:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Yes it gives me a timeout. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping okay thanks. Strange... I wonder if the
|doi-access=
should be changed to reflect that not everyone can access it for free without registering or if this is just a temporary issue. Umimmak (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)- Template:PingTemplate:PingNever intended to give the impression that gynogenesis is the exclusive form of reproduction for this species, some forms of the species definitely reproduce sexually. ref [3] is working fine for me without timing out. Maybe it was a temporary issue? Let me know if there is anything else I can address.Glorioussandwich (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping okay thanks. Strange... I wonder if the
- Template:Ping Yes it gives me a timeout. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Just to clarify you can't see this PDF? I realized there might be confusion because there are two references being discussed. Umimmak (talk) 14:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping looks like I need to register VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Ping but ref [3] isn't paywalled? Hence the
- Template:Replyto oops I think
- I’m confused, isn’t this sufficient? Template:Tq Neither the hook nor the arcticle say this is the exclusive form of reproduction they engage in. Umimmak (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Replyto I checked the first reference it doesn’t exclusively say they carry out this sort of reproduction. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 13:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)