Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Glasser v. United States"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Savidan |
imported>Muboshgu (reviewed) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:*Reviewed: [[Template:Did you know nominations/Washington v. Texas|Washington v. Texas]] | :*Reviewed: [[Template:Did you know nominations/Washington v. Texas|Washington v. Texas]] | ||
− | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 00:12, 3 March 2012
Glasser v. United States
- ... that Glasser v. United States was both the first U.S. Supreme Court case to hold that an attorney conflict of interest violated the Assistance of Counsel Clause and the first case to hold that juries must be drawn from a "cross-section of the community"?
Created/expanded by Savidan (talk). Self nom at 03:02, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: Washington v. Texas
Article is new and meets all DYK criteria. Only problem here is that the hook is too long. It may not be possible to include both "firsts" in this hook and keep it under 200 characters. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)