Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gold Base"
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>IznoBot |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from February 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from February 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | ||
| − | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Gold Base]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gold Base|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Gold Base|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</ | + | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Gold Base]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gold Base|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Gold Base|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}} |
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC).<br /> | The result was: <b>promoted</b> by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC).<br /> | ||
Revision as of 04:13, 19 October 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Gold Base's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gold Base
- ... that Gold Base (pictured) near Riverside County, California, is the Church of Scientology's closely guarded international headquarters?
Expanded and nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 21:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC).
- I would de-emphasise the references to Hubbard's supposed reincarnation (there are three of them: one in the lede, one in the body of the article, and one in an image caption.) At present this is only based on a single source, which quotes a single ex-Scientologist (Schless Pressley). It's not an uncontested narrative, as presented in the article; it is even contested in the cited source, and the article should reflect that. Andreas JN466 23:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Sufficiently expanded recently enough. Inline citation referencing meets DYK standards (I have done a spot check of statements in the lead to ensure they are backed by referenced statements in the article body.) No close paraphrasing or other copyvio concerns. Statements about Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman (living persons mentioned in the lead) are adequately referenced and sufficiently neutral. No overall issues with neutrality. Hook fact is neutral and does not mention living people. It would have been nicer to have a more interesting hook, but it's sufficient given the controversial nature of the topic. Inline citation to the Portland Mercury is present for the hook fact, and AGF as an offline source. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
