Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Golem (Casken opera)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Narutolovehinata5 (comment) |
imported>Gerda Arendt (ty) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:'''ALT2''' ... that [[John Casken]]'s 1989 opera '''''[[Golem (Casken opera)|Golem]]''''' is a recipient of a [[Gramophone Award]], often considered as the "Oscars of classical music"? | :'''ALT2''' ... that [[John Casken]]'s 1989 opera '''''[[Golem (Casken opera)|Golem]]''''' is a recipient of a [[Gramophone Award]], often considered as the "Oscars of classical music"? | ||
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt|Marosc9|BabbaQ|Yoninah}} [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC) | :{{ping|Gerda Arendt|Marosc9|BabbaQ|Yoninah}} [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: Thank you for offering. ALT1 is fine by me. ALT2 has too much focus on the award for my taste. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 12:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 22 April 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Golem (Casken opera)
- ... that John Casken's 1989 opera Golem received the first Britten Award for Composition? Source: book source
- Reviewed: Scaled piculet
Created by Marosc9 (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 16:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC).
- new and long enough (barely). Inline citations checks. Review made. No image to review. Hook looks interesting enough for inclusion. BabbaQ (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
What is this award? If it's notable, can a page be started to link it? Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- No idea. Midnight, and Easter for 2 days. Patience please. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would have created a page on the Britten Award for Composition myself but research on the internet came up with almost nothing on it beyond John Casken being the first winner for Golem and Philip Cashian being the second winner, though I don't know what the composition was in his case. I've emailed the Britten Pears Foundation today who, if anyone should, should have more information. Let's see what they come back with. --Marosc9 (talk)
- Template:Ping thank you. But if it's not a notable award, why are you using it as a hook fact? Could you suggest another hook? Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think you need to ask those questions of the nominator Gerda Arendt. I'm hoping the Pears Britten Foundation will be able to provide enough of a lead so that I can write an article on the award.
- Suggesting ALTs below, might work better since the award in question does have an article (which says that it is considered the Oscars of classical music):
- ALT1 ... that John Casken's 1989 opera Golem won the 1991 Gramophone Award for Best Contemporary Recording?
- ALT2 ... that John Casken's 1989 opera Golem is a recipient of a Gramophone Award, often considered as the "Oscars of classical music"?
- Template:Ping Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for offering. ALT1 is fine by me. ALT2 has too much focus on the award for my taste. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)