Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gordon Falcon (Royal Navy officer)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Frietjes
(Clean up duplicate template arguments using findargdups: repairing duplicate |page =;)
imported>Dumelow
(review)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Ykraps|Ykraps]], review follows: article moved to mainspace 16 February; article is of good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable (largely offline) sources; no overly close paraphrasing from the online sources, AGF this is the case for the offline sources; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to an offline source - AGF that this backs it up; image is freely and appropriately licensed (from a 1900 book); a QPQ has been completed.  Looks good to me - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 15:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:16, 28 February 2020

Gordon Falcon (Royal Navy officer)

Royal Navy officers boarding Chesapeake, one of whom was Falcon
Royal Navy officers boarding Chesapeake, one of whom was Falcon
  • ... that Gordon Falcon was one of the British officers sent aboard USS Chesapeake to search for Royal Navy deserters during the Chesapeake–Leopard affair? Source:Bohn, Henry George (1853). Bohn's extra volume (Vol.VII}. p. 199.

Moved to mainspace by Ykraps (talk). Self-nominated at 09:59, 16 February 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Hi Ykraps, review follows: article moved to mainspace 16 February; article is of good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable (largely offline) sources; no overly close paraphrasing from the online sources, AGF this is the case for the offline sources; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to an offline source - AGF that this backs it up; image is freely and appropriately licensed (from a 1900 book); a QPQ has been completed. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)