Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Gosthani River"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Rosiestep
(no)
imported>BlueMoonset
(withdrawn by nominator/creator; was not expanded sufficiently to qualify for 5x requirement)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from June 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=June 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 +
Withdrawn by nominator/creator Ashwin147.
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Gosthani River====
 
====Gosthani River====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Gosthani River|Gosthani River}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Gosthani River|Gosthani River}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Gosthani River]]''' is under threat from bauxite mining and extraction of water from its riverbed using borewells?
 
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Gosthani River]]''' is under threat from bauxite mining and extraction of water from its riverbed using borewells?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:{{*mp}}
 
:{{*mp}}
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Rajasekhar1961|Rajasekhar1961]] ([[User talk:Rajasekhar1961|talk]]), [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) at 10:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Rajasekhar1961|Rajasekhar1961]] ([[User talk:Rajasekhar1961|talk]]), [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) at 10:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Gosthani River|Rajasekhar1961}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Gosthani River|Ashwin147}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Aptostichus angelinajolieae]]. QPQ therefore is done. [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 03:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:* Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Aptostichus angelinajolieae]]. QPQ therefore is done. [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 03:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 15:
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Date and hook's ref verified.  All refs appear to be RS. Copyvio Check doesn't detect any violations. After spot checking 3 newspaper refs, I don't find any close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Hook is interesting and its length is fine. The only issue appears to be length as the articles was ~865 ch and now is ~2956, so it requires expansion before I can continue with this review. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 22:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Date and hook's ref verified.  All refs appear to be RS. Copyvio Check doesn't detect any violations. After spot checking 3 newspaper refs, I don't find any close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Hook is interesting and its length is fine. The only issue appears to be length as the articles was ~865 ch and now is ~2956, so it requires expansion before I can continue with this review. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 22:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 
::* I would like this nomination to be pulled off the list. I've added whatever I could find on it and referenced it but I counted it wrong. Thanks. [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 04:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 
::* I would like this nomination to be pulled off the list. I've added whatever I could find on it and referenced it but I counted it wrong. Thanks. [[User:Ashwin147|Ashwin147]] ([[User talk:Ashwin147|talk]]) 04:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
:::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Nom doesn't meet length requirements. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 06:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
+
:::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Nom doesn't meet length requirements. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 06:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC){{#if:no|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 00:36, 6 July 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator/creator Ashwin147.

Gosthani River

  • ... that the Gosthani River is under threat from bauxite mining and extraction of water from its riverbed using borewells?

5x expanded by Rajasekhar1961 (talk), Ashwin147 (talk). Nominated by Ashwin147 (talk) at 10:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Date and hook's ref verified. All refs appear to be RS. Copyvio Check doesn't detect any violations. After spot checking 3 newspaper refs, I don't find any close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Hook is interesting and its length is fine. The only issue appears to be length as the articles was ~865 ch and now is ~2956, so it requires expansion before I can continue with this review. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I would like this nomination to be pulled off the list. I've added whatever I could find on it and referenced it but I counted it wrong. Thanks. Ashwin147 (talk) 04:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px Nom doesn't meet length requirements. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)