Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Theatre, Perth"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dan arndt
m (Tweak)
imported>Gatoclass
(reply)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have pulled this from p6 because of [[WP:PARAPHRASE]] issues with at least one of its sources. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)     
 
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I have pulled this from p6 because of [[WP:PARAPHRASE]] issues with at least one of its sources. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 13:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)     
 
** {{ping|Dan arndt}} Additionally, the QPQ review used does not mention wheter every parargaph of the article has a citation, which is required by DYK rules. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 13:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 
** {{ping|Dan arndt}} Additionally, the QPQ review used does not mention wheter every parargaph of the article has a citation, which is required by DYK rules. [[User:Pppery|<span style="position:relative;top:10px">P</span>p<span style="position:relative;bottom:5px">p</span>]][[User talk:Pppery|e<big style="position:relative;top:10px">r</big>y]] 13:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
***{{U|Pppery}} Whilst I didn't specifically state it in the QPQ review the article in question had several citations for each paragraph. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 15:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
+
***{{U|Pppery}} Whilst I didn't specifically state it in the QPQ review the article in question had several citations for each paragraph. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 15:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)  
 +
* With regard to PARAPHRASE, the following sentence in particular is very close to the source" ''Over the years, very few changes were made to the façade of the Grand Theatre, with the brickwork being painted over, a new neon sign added down the length of the façade, and the original ornate metal verandah replaced with a more modern style.'' There are also a number of phrases taken directly from other sources which I think could be reworked, such as "in aid of wounded soldiers", "bailiffs were called in", "taken over by ... bought out the other members". [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] ([[User talk:Gatoclass|talk]]) 10:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)   
 +
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:29, 10 October 2016

Grand Theatre, Perth

  • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link], or briefly cite, the source)
  • Reviewed: Clio (Hendrik Goltzius)

Moved to mainspace by Dan arndt (talk). Self-nominated at 09:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New, long enough, neutral. Hook is interesting and reliably sourced. Good to go. Citobun (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg I have pulled this from p6 because of WP:PARAPHRASE issues with at least one of its sources. Gatoclass (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Template:Ping Additionally, the QPQ review used does not mention wheter every parargaph of the article has a citation, which is required by DYK rules. Pppery 13:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
      • Template:U Whilst I didn't specifically state it in the QPQ review the article in question had several citations for each paragraph. Dan arndt (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
  • With regard to PARAPHRASE, the following sentence in particular is very close to the source" Over the years, very few changes were made to the façade of the Grand Theatre, with the brickwork being painted over, a new neon sign added down the length of the façade, and the original ornate metal verandah replaced with a more modern style. There are also a number of phrases taken directly from other sources which I think could be reworked, such as "in aid of wounded soldiers", "bailiffs were called in", "taken over by ... bought out the other members". Gatoclass (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)