Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grey-chinned minivet"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Umimmak (approve, with possible suggestion for alt wording) |
imported>PaleCloudedWhite (Comment) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 23:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 23:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
+ | *'''Comment''' I agree with Umimmak - it would be preferable to change the wording to "has been observed" or "has been recorded", which is more standard usage and avoids the suggestion that this behaviour has only ever happened once. [[User:PaleCloudedWhite|PaleCloudedWhite]] ([[User talk:PaleCloudedWhite|talk]]) 07:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 07:19, 18 April 2018
DYK toolbox |
---|
Grey-chinned minivet
- ... that in one instance, a male grey-chinned minivet (pair pictured) approached a female while holding a flower? Source: "Pre-mating behaviour by a male slowly approaching a female along branches while holding a (white) flower in its bill ... Copulation followed immediately." The Birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula
- ALT1:... that in one instance, a male grey-chinned minivet (pair pictured) used a flower to attract a female? Source: same source
- Reviewed: Mudéjar theme park
5x expanded by Gulumeemee (talk). Self-nominated at 04:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC).
- Template:Ping
- long enough (Template:Tq), new enough (Template:Tq). Hasn't been on front page before. Every non-lede paragraph has citations; no apparent copyright violations. Images are appropriately licensed.
- Hooks interesting, properly formatted, stated in article, and appropriately referenced. Image in article.
- QPQ done
- I wonder if better wording might make use of Template:Tq/Template:Tq or something like that instead of Template:Tq? But I guess your wording in the original / ALT1 is fine.
- Slight preference for Template:Tq over Template:Tq, but I'll leave the decision to the promoter.
Umimmak (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Umimmak - it would be preferable to change the wording to "has been observed" or "has been recorded", which is more standard usage and avoids the suggestion that this behaviour has only ever happened once. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)