Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Simon Burchell (cmt) |
imported>ThaddeusB (good to go) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) | :* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:21, 21 April 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Grolier Codex
- ... that the authenticity of the supposedly Maya Grolier Codex is disputed, even though it uses pre-Columbian paper?
- Reviewed: Abouriou
Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC).
- New article from redirect. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- 16px Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)