Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ThaddeusB
(good to go)
imported>PumpkinSky
(prep2)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
|monthyear=April 2013
+
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Grolier Codex]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Grolier Codex|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 00:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC).<br />
 +
}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Grolier Codex====
 
====Grolier Codex====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Grolier Codex|Grolier Codex}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Grolier Codex|Grolier Codex}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that the authenticity of the supposedly [[Maya civilization|Maya]] '''[[Grolier Codex]]''' is disputed, even though it uses [[amate|pre-Columbian paper]]?
 
{{*mp}}... that the authenticity of the supposedly [[Maya civilization|Maya]] '''[[Grolier Codex]]''' is disputed, even though it uses [[amate|pre-Columbian paper]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:{{*mp}} ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Abouriou|Abouriou]]
 
:{{*mp}} ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Abouriou|Abouriou]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]).&nbsp;Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Grolier Codex|Simon Burchell}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation.  On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not.  Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full).  Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading.  Good work. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
+
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation.  On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not.  Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full).  Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading.  Good work. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 00:38, 22 April 2013

17x17px The following is an archived discussion of Grolier Codex's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know12x12px (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

Grolier Codex

Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)