Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>PumpkinSky (prep2) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Grolier Codex==== | ====Grolier Codex==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Grolier Codex|Grolier Codex}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Grolier Codex|Grolier Codex}} | ||
| − | + | *... that the authenticity of the supposedly [[Maya civilization|Maya]] '''[[Grolier Codex]]''' is disputed, even though it uses [[amate|pre-Columbian paper]]? | |
| − | : | + | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Abouriou|Abouriou]] |
<small>Created by [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
:* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) | :* New article from redirect. [[User:Simon Burchell|Simon Burchell]] ([[User talk:Simon Burchell|talk]]) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 6 March 2018
- 17x17px The following is an archived discussion of Grolier Codex's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know12x12px (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Grolier Codex
- ... that the authenticity of the supposedly Maya Grolier Codex is disputed, even though it uses pre-Columbian paper?
- Reviewed: Abouriou
Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC).
- New article from redirect. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- 16px Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)