Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aymatth2
(correction)
imported>Ribbet32
(review)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
::*{{ping|Ribbet32}} You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)  
 
::*{{ping|Ribbet32}} You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)  
*'''ALT2''':... that 71% of permanently protected land in the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' has no natural vegetation?  
+
*'''ALT2''':... that 71% of permanently protected land in the '''[[Guapi-Guapiaçú Environmental Protection Area]]''' in Brazil has no natural vegetation?  
 
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Being asleep, and the fact that it was caught and corrected, is plenty excuse ;) I added "in Brazil" to the hook as 99.9% of readers (including me) won't know where this is; think it's good now. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 23:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:49, 23 October 2016

Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area

Created/expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Nominated by Iazyges (talk) at 19:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Template:Ping Article is new enough (when nominated), long enough, nominator doesn't require QPQ since he/she has only one DYK credit, though creator has had several. Hooks need correcting or clarification. Hook 1 says the area has lost 71% of its vegetation, but Bing Translator tells me the source merely says vegetation is absent from the 71%, not that it was once there and lost. Hook 2 appears to be verified regarding the 15% figure, however, in article, it states "1,539 hectares (3,800 acres) has natural vegetation" and Bing Translator tells me the "1,539" figure refers to land without vegetation. Ribbet32 (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping You are absolutely right about the hooks. I must have been half asleep when I looked at that table, and mixed up APA and APP. No excuse. I have corrected the article to say what the source says. I suggest ALT2 below: Aymatth2 (talk) 23:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg Being asleep, and the fact that it was caught and corrected, is plenty excuse ;) I added "in Brazil" to the hook as 99.9% of readers (including me) won't know where this is; think it's good now. Ribbet32 (talk) 23:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)