Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hahoe byeolsingut talnori"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Muboshgu (also) |
imported>Maculosae tegmine lyncis m |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The word "lecherous", which appears in the hook, doesn't appear in the article. If the offline source can support it, the word should be added to the article. If not, it should be deleted from the hook. Otherwise, this meets criteria as a new article of size, with proper citations, AGF on offline. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The word "lecherous", which appears in the hook, doesn't appear in the article. If the offline source can support it, the word should be added to the article. If not, it should be deleted from the hook. Otherwise, this meets criteria as a new article of size, with proper citations, AGF on offline. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:*Also, is there any reason we're using the word "micturate", which I didn't know, rather than "urinate", which I believe most English speakers will know? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | :*Also, is there any reason we're using the word "micturate", which I didn't know, rather than "urinate", which I believe most English speakers will know? – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::Hello; (1) While the word "lecherous" may not appear, there is referenced support for "having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire" - does that not suffice? happy for it to be cut if not; (2) three main reasons I guess: (a) wouldn't want to lower the tone of DYK; (b) this is an education project - great to have some vocab-building along the way; (c) as per all those books where the naughty bits are translated into Latin, hopefully those of sufficient letters to understand have also sufficient maturity not to be led astray by such depravity! Thanks, [[User:Maculosae tegmine lyncis|Maculosae tegmine lyncis]] ([[User talk:Maculosae tegmine lyncis|talk]]) 09:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 09:35, 16 May 2012
Hahoe byeolsingut talnori
- ... that the ribald Korean dance-drama Hahoe byeolsingut talnori features a lecherous apostate priest and a micturating dancing girl?
Created/expanded by Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk). Self nom at 13:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
The word "lecherous", which appears in the hook, doesn't appear in the article. If the offline source can support it, the word should be added to the article. If not, it should be deleted from the hook. Otherwise, this meets criteria as a new article of size, with proper citations, AGF on offline. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)- Also, is there any reason we're using the word "micturate", which I didn't know, rather than "urinate", which I believe most English speakers will know? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hello; (1) While the word "lecherous" may not appear, there is referenced support for "having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire" - does that not suffice? happy for it to be cut if not; (2) three main reasons I guess: (a) wouldn't want to lower the tone of DYK; (b) this is an education project - great to have some vocab-building along the way; (c) as per all those books where the naughty bits are translated into Latin, hopefully those of sufficient letters to understand have also sufficient maturity not to be led astray by such depravity! Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)