Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Raj (approver)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Havradim
(Changed status due to lack of an inline citation)
imported>Whispyhistory
(reply and ALT4)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
|sign        = [[User:Havradim|Havradim]] ([[User talk:Havradim|talk]]) 05:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
 
|sign        = [[User:Havradim|Havradim]] ([[User talk:Havradim|talk]]) 05:52, 20 December 2019 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
:::Thanks for reviewing {{reply|Havradim}}....I don't mind which hook, although '''ALT2''' I thought might work. Everyone appears to agree he was suspicious. I tweaked yours a little to make '''Alt4'''. Someone may have an alternative suggestion.
 +
::::'''ALT4'''...Historians have disputed whether '''[[Hans Raj (approver)|Hans Raj]]''', who turned state's witness for the [[British Raj]], had been a police agent all along? <small>Hans Raj’s role, however, is contested history. Some Indian historians have argued that Jallianwala Bagh was a planned massacre, alleging that Hans Raj was a British spy who collaborated with Dyer, who wanted to punish Indians for the violence that had preceded the massacre ... Most British historians, however, either make little mention of Hans Raj or play down his role in the incident...Most popular retellings of the incident—school textbooks...etc.. or films and documentaries—simply omit Hans Raj[https://caravanmagazine.in/perspectives/what-we-chose-not-remember-centenary-jallianwala-bagh]…believed by some historians that Hans Raj was in league with local police[https://books.google.co.uk/books?redir_esc=y&id=Mk7ptwEACAAJ&q=satypal#v=onepage&q=Hans%20Raj&f=false]</small> [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 13:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:08, 20 December 2019

Hans Raj (approver)

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 11:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
Thanks for reviewing Template:Reply....I don't mind which hook, although ALT2 I thought might work. Everyone appears to agree he was suspicious. I tweaked yours a little to make Alt4. Someone may have an alternative suggestion.
ALT4...Historians have disputed whether Hans Raj, who turned state's witness for the British Raj, had been a police agent all along? Hans Raj’s role, however, is contested history. Some Indian historians have argued that Jallianwala Bagh was a planned massacre, alleging that Hans Raj was a British spy who collaborated with Dyer, who wanted to punish Indians for the violence that had preceded the massacre ... Most British historians, however, either make little mention of Hans Raj or play down his role in the incident...Most popular retellings of the incident—school textbooks...etc.. or films and documentaries—simply omit Hans Raj[6]…believed by some historians that Hans Raj was in league with local police[7] Whispyhistory (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)