Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Harriet Moody"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Victuallers (:Ada Lovelace Day late nominee needs help to rush for Tuesday ~~~~) |
imported>Mackensen (reviewed; problem found) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* --> | :* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* --> | ||
:[[Ada Lovelace Day]] late nominee needs help to rush for Tuesday [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 00:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | :[[Ada Lovelace Day]] late nominee needs help to rush for Tuesday [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 00:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is new enough and long enough. No major policy problems with the article; citations are present throughout. I have concerns about paraphrasing; for example, the cottages are described as "whimsical", which is how Nye describes them. That should probably be quoted directly. The second paragraph tracks very closely with Chafe, and Chafe itself is quoting a source. Nelson and Nye conflict on whether Wilma was involved in banking transactions for the cottages. Hook is interesting and verified in Nye and Redmon. QPQ is done. I think if the use of Nye is reviewed we're okay here. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 13:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 11 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Harriet Moody
- ... that Harriet Moody used salvaged architectural features in her California Storybook Cottages due to war rationing on building goods?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dwarka
- Comment: For WikiProject Women In Red
Created by SusunW (talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC).
- Ada Lovelace Day late nominee needs help to rush for Tuesday Victuallers (talk) 00:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- 16px The article is new enough and long enough. No major policy problems with the article; citations are present throughout. I have concerns about paraphrasing; for example, the cottages are described as "whimsical", which is how Nye describes them. That should probably be quoted directly. The second paragraph tracks very closely with Chafe, and Chafe itself is quoting a source. Nelson and Nye conflict on whether Wilma was involved in banking transactions for the cottages. Hook is interesting and verified in Nye and Redmon. QPQ is done. I think if the use of Nye is reviewed we're okay here. Mackensen (talk) 13:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
