Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Heinz Baked Beanz"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (needs expansion and secondary sourcing) |
imported>Yoninah m (ce) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - hook reference is dead. - [[User:Theornamentalist|Theornamentalist]] ([[User talk:Theornamentalist|talk]]) 05:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - hook reference is dead. - [[User:Theornamentalist|Theornamentalist]] ([[User talk:Theornamentalist|talk]]) 05:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::*I've updated it to the current link and added some more to back it up. <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(constabulary)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 17:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | ::*I've updated it to the current link and added some more to back it up. <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]]''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(constabulary)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 17:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] As it stands, the article is not "complete" per [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Other supplementary rules for the article|Rule D7]]. The subject is certainly deserving of an article, but this one only mentions the opening of factories, a 1967 advertising jingle, and a 2001 allegation of BPA. Surely the brand has sales statistics, recipe information, and other information typical of brand names? Also, much of the | + | :::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] As it stands, the article is not "complete" per [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Other supplementary rules for the article|Rule D7]]. The subject is certainly deserving of an article, but this one only mentions the opening of factories, a 1967 advertising jingle, and a 2001 allegation of BPA. Surely the brand has sales statistics, recipe information, and other information typical of brand names? Also, much of the text (sourced to footnotes 1 and 3) is sourced to the company's own website instead of [[WP:SECONDARY|secondary sources]]. And the hook ref takes up only one sentence in the article. Surely there is more to say about it, and surely the company defended itself in some way? |
:::*Since the information about the opening of factories was stated twice in this short article, I moved it into one paragraph. This leaves the article with just over 1500 characters (1565 to be exact). I will be happy to re-review when more content is added to flesh out the page. | :::*Since the information about the opening of factories was stated twice in this short article, I moved it into one paragraph. This leaves the article with just over 1500 characters (1565 to be exact). I will be happy to re-review when more content is added to flesh out the page. | ||
:::*''Note: This DYK review is being applied against the QPQ requirement for [[Template:Did you know nominations/Apollo 11 lunar sample display, Apollo 17 lunar sample display]].'' [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | :::*''Note: This DYK review is being applied against the QPQ requirement for [[Template:Did you know nominations/Apollo 11 lunar sample display, Apollo 17 lunar sample display]].'' [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 09:37, 20 November 2012
Heinz Baked Beanz
- ... that some Heinz Baked Beanz made in 2001 have been scientifically proven to contain a hormone disruptor?
Created/expanded by Rcsprinter123 (talk). Self nom at 15:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- hook reference is dead. - Theornamentalist (talk) 05:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've updated it to the current link and added some more to back it up. Rcsprinter (constabulary) @ 17:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
As it stands, the article is not "complete" per Rule D7. The subject is certainly deserving of an article, but this one only mentions the opening of factories, a 1967 advertising jingle, and a 2001 allegation of BPA. Surely the brand has sales statistics, recipe information, and other information typical of brand names? Also, much of the text (sourced to footnotes 1 and 3) is sourced to the company's own website instead of secondary sources. And the hook ref takes up only one sentence in the article. Surely there is more to say about it, and surely the company defended itself in some way?
- Since the information about the opening of factories was stated twice in this short article, I moved it into one paragraph. This leaves the article with just over 1500 characters (1565 to be exact). I will be happy to re-review when more content is added to flesh out the page.
- Note: This DYK review is being applied against the QPQ requirement for Template:Did you know nominations/Apollo 11 lunar sample display, Apollo 17 lunar sample display. Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)