Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/High Line (New York City)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>LookingYourBest m (comment: minor error in hook) |
imported>Epicgenius |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that the '''[[High Line (New York City)|High Line]]''', once an abandoned elevated railway slated for demolition in [[New York City]], is now a [[linear park]] with | + | * ... that the '''[[High Line (New York City)|High Line]]''', once an abandoned elevated railway slated for demolition in [[New York City]], is now a [[linear park]] with about 5 million annual visitors? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
:* '''ALT1''':... that the elevated '''[[High Line (New York City)|High Line]]''' railway viaduct in [[New York City]], now a [[linear park]], was originally constructed to avoid trains running in nearby streets? | :* '''ALT1''':... that the elevated '''[[High Line (New York City)|High Line]]''' railway viaduct in [[New York City]], now a [[linear park]], was originally constructed to avoid trains running in nearby streets? | ||
:* ''Reviewed:'' [[Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō|Murata Jukō]] | :* ''Reviewed:'' [[Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō|Murata Jukō]] | ||
| − | :* ''Comment'': Several other users, such as [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]], have worked on this article significantly. I nominated the article for GA and am the editor who added the most text to the page. | + | :* ''Comment'': Several other users, such as [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]], have worked on this article significantly. I nominated the article for GA and am the editor who added the most text to the page. Also, the original hook said "over 5 million" instead of "about 5 million". |
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 14:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) at 14:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:* Just as a very quick comment, the article and source say that the park gets "''nearly'' 5 million annual visitors", whereas the hook says "''over'' 5 million visitors". Might want to alter that. (Great article, and a great park!) -'''[[User:LookingYourBest|<span style="color:black"><small>L<big><span style="color:red">ÒÓ</span></big>kingYourBest</small></span>]]'''<sup>([[User talk:LookingYourBest|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/LookingYourBest|Edits]])</sup> 19:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC) | :* Just as a very quick comment, the article and source say that the park gets "''nearly'' 5 million annual visitors", whereas the hook says "''over'' 5 million visitors". Might want to alter that. (Great article, and a great park!) -'''[[User:LookingYourBest|<span style="color:black"><small>L<big><span style="color:red">ÒÓ</span></big>kingYourBest</small></span>]]'''<sup>([[User talk:LookingYourBest|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/LookingYourBest|Edits]])</sup> 19:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::*Thank you for your comments. I fixed that. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 31 October 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
High Line (New York City)
- ... that the High Line, once an abandoned elevated railway slated for demolition in New York City, is now a linear park with about 5 million annual visitors?
- ALT1:... that the elevated High Line railway viaduct in New York City, now a linear park, was originally constructed to avoid trains running in nearby streets?
- Reviewed: Murata Jukō
- Comment: Several other users, such as Beyond My Ken, have worked on this article significantly. I nominated the article for GA and am the editor who added the most text to the page. Also, the original hook said "over 5 million" instead of "about 5 million".
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 14:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC).
- Just as a very quick comment, the article and source say that the park gets "nearly 5 million annual visitors", whereas the hook says "over 5 million visitors". Might want to alter that. (Great article, and a great park!) -LÒÓkingYourBest(Talk|Edits) 19:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. I fixed that. Epicgenius (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
