Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/In Praise of Polytheism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ffranc (Nominating In Praise of Polytheism for DYK) |
imported>Bait30 (review) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* <!-- | + | :*{{DYK checklist |
| + | <!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is ---> | ||
| + | |newness = y | ||
| + | |length = y | ||
| + | |eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none---> | ||
| + | |sourced = y | ||
| + | |neutral = y | ||
| + | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
| + | |policyother = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none---> | ||
| + | |hookcited = AGF | ||
| + | |hookinterest = y | ||
| + | |hookother = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none---> | ||
| + | |picfree = NA | ||
| + | |picused = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)? If no picture is used, leave blank---> | ||
| + | |picclear = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px? If no picture is used, leave blank---> | ||
| + | |qpq = y | ||
| + | |status = y | ||
| + | |comments = Everything looks good. If you want, you could link [[striptease]] and [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment philosophy]], but it's definitely optional. I prefer ALT0 because stripping is more interesting than ancient Rome in my opinion. | ||
| + | |sign = [[User:Bait30|<span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b> Bait30 </b></span>]] [[User Talk:Bait30|<sup><span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b>''Talk 2 me pls''?</b></span></sup>]] 04:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)<!---Your signature. Generally, can be left as is---> | ||
| + | }} | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 04:20, 5 October 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
In Praise of Polytheism
- ... that the essay "In Praise of Polytheism" dismisses all similarities between Enlightenment philosophy and striptease? Source: Marquard, Odo (1989). "In Praise of Polytheism (On Monomythical and Polymythical Thinking)". Farewell to Matters of Principle: Philosophical Studies. Translated by Wallace, Robert M. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 91. ISBN 0-19-505114-9.
Mythonudism strives for something impossible; because, it seems to me, every demythologization is a well compensated process: the more myths one takes off, the more myths stay on. That is why I have doubts about the striptease: doubts (to put it more precisely) about the idea of the enlightenment (late in world history) as a striptease operating with myths. This idea, I said, is itself a myth; so it is time to find a countermyth to it.
- this particular page isn't part of the Google Books preview, but web searches for parts of the quote will yield some snippets from a Scribd.com upload. Of course, there is also piracy.- ALT1:... that a modern Gnostic disapproved of the essay "In Praise of Polytheism" because he thought it repeated the apostasy of the Roman emperor Julian? Source: Taubes 1983, p. 464, quoted in Gladigow (2001, p. 146) (accusation, in German: "Die Rekurse auf Mythos post Christum sind in Wahrheit nur Wiederholungen der Apostasie Julians") & Styfhals 2019, p. 264 (Taubes as a modern Gnostic; also p. 2: "...Taubes, as a modern Gnostic...")
Improved to Good Article status by Ffranc (talk). Self-nominated at 09:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.