Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/In Praise of Polytheism"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bait30
(review)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 2)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;16:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|In Praise of Polytheism}}
 
{{DYK header|In Praise of Polytheism}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=In Praise of Polytheism|In Praise of Polytheism}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=In Praise of Polytheism|In Praise of Polytheism}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the essay "'''[[In Praise of Polytheism]]'''" dismisses all similarities between Enlightenment philosophy and striptease?  <small>Source: {{cite book |last=Marquard |first=Odo |year=1989 |chapter=In Praise of Polytheism (On Monomythical and Polymythical Thinking) |translator-last=Wallace |translator-first=Robert M. |title=Farewell to Matters of Principle: Philosophical Studies |location=New York and Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |p=91 |isbn=0-19-505114-9 |quote=Mythonudism strives for something impossible; because, it seems to me, every demythologization is a well compensated process: the more myths one takes off, the more myths stay on. That is why I have doubts about the striptease: doubts (to put it more precisely) about the idea of the enlightenment (late in world history) as a striptease operating with myths. This idea, I said, is itself a myth; so it is time to find a countermyth to it. }} - this particular page isn't part of the Google Books preview, but web searches for parts of the quote will yield some snippets from a Scribd.com upload. Of course, there is also piracy.</small>
 
* ... that the essay "'''[[In Praise of Polytheism]]'''" dismisses all similarities between Enlightenment philosophy and striptease?  <small>Source: {{cite book |last=Marquard |first=Odo |year=1989 |chapter=In Praise of Polytheism (On Monomythical and Polymythical Thinking) |translator-last=Wallace |translator-first=Robert M. |title=Farewell to Matters of Principle: Philosophical Studies |location=New York and Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |p=91 |isbn=0-19-505114-9 |quote=Mythonudism strives for something impossible; because, it seems to me, every demythologization is a well compensated process: the more myths one takes off, the more myths stay on. That is why I have doubts about the striptease: doubts (to put it more precisely) about the idea of the enlightenment (late in world history) as a striptease operating with myths. This idea, I said, is itself a myth; so it is time to find a countermyth to it. }} - this particular page isn't part of the Google Books preview, but web searches for parts of the quote will yield some snippets from a Scribd.com upload. Of course, there is also piracy.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that a modern [[Gnosticism|Gnostic]] disapproved of the essay "'''[[In Praise of Polytheism]]'''" because he thought it repeated the apostasy of the Roman emperor [[Julian (emperor)|Julian]]?  <small>Source: Taubes 1983, p. 464, quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=TQmmVSXq0fcC&pg=PA146 Gladigow (2001, p. 146)] (accusation, in German: "Die Rekurse auf Mythos post Christum sind in Wahrheit nur Wiederholungen der Apostasie Julians") & [https://books.google.com/books?id=zK94DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA264 Styfhals 2019, p. 264] (Taubes as a modern Gnostic; also [https://books.google.com/books?id=zK94DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 p. 2:] "...Taubes, as a modern Gnostic...")</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that a modern [[Gnosticism|Gnostic]] disapproved of the essay "'''[[In Praise of Polytheism]]'''" because he thought it repeated the apostasy of the Roman emperor [[Julian (emperor)|Julian]]?  <small>Source: Taubes 1983, p. 464, quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=TQmmVSXq0fcC&pg=PA146 Gladigow (2001, p. 146)] (accusation, in German: "Die Rekurse auf Mythos post Christum sind in Wahrheit nur Wiederholungen der Apostasie Julians") & [https://books.google.com/books?id=zK94DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA264 Styfhals 2019, p. 264] (Taubes as a modern Gnostic; also [https://books.google.com/books?id=zK94DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 p. 2:] "...Taubes, as a modern Gnostic...")</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/(523764) 2014 WC510]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/(523764) 2014 WC510]]
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Ffranc|Ffranc]] ([[User talk:Ffranc|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Ffranc|Ffranc]] ([[User talk:Ffranc|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|In Praise of Polytheism|Ffranc|subpage=In Praise of Polytheism}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*{{DYK checklist
 
:*{{DYK checklist
Line 23: Line 15:
 
|newness      = y
 
|newness      = y
 
|length      = y
 
|length      = y
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
+
|eligibilityother =  
 
|sourced      = y
 
|sourced      = y
 
|neutral      =  y
 
|neutral      =  y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
 
|plagiarismfree = y
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
+
|policyother  =  
 
|hookcited    = AGF
 
|hookcited    = AGF
 
|hookinterest = y
 
|hookinterest = y
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
+
|hookother    =  
 
|picfree      = NA
 
|picfree      = NA
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picused      =  
|picclear    = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picclear    =  
 
|qpq          = y
 
|qpq          = y
 
|status      = y
 
|status      = y
 
|comments    = Everything looks good. If you want, you could link [[striptease]] and [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment philosophy]], but it's definitely optional. I prefer ALT0 because stripping is more interesting than ancient Rome in my opinion.  
 
|comments    = Everything looks good. If you want, you could link [[striptease]] and [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment philosophy]], but it's definitely optional. I prefer ALT0 because stripping is more interesting than ancient Rome in my opinion.  
|sign        = [[User:Bait30|<span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b>&nbsp;Bait30&nbsp;</b></span>]]&nbsp;[[User Talk:Bait30|<sup><span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b>''Talk 2 me pls''?</b></span></sup>]] 04:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
+
|sign        = [[User:Bait30|<span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b>&nbsp;Bait30&nbsp;</b></span>]]&nbsp;[[User Talk:Bait30|<sup><span style='color: #ffffff;background-color: #bf5700;'><b>''Talk 2 me pls''?</b></span></sup>]] 04:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
}}
+
}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 16:15, 14 October 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

In Praise of Polytheism

  • ... that the essay "In Praise of Polytheism" dismisses all similarities between Enlightenment philosophy and striptease? Source: Marquard, Odo (1989). "In Praise of Polytheism (On Monomythical and Polymythical Thinking)". Farewell to Matters of Principle: Philosophical Studies. Translated by Wallace, Robert M. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 91. ISBN 0-19-505114-9. Mythonudism strives for something impossible; because, it seems to me, every demythologization is a well compensated process: the more myths one takes off, the more myths stay on. That is why I have doubts about the striptease: doubts (to put it more precisely) about the idea of the enlightenment (late in world history) as a striptease operating with myths. This idea, I said, is itself a myth; so it is time to find a countermyth to it. - this particular page isn't part of the Google Books preview, but web searches for parts of the quote will yield some snippets from a Scribd.com upload. Of course, there is also piracy.
    • ALT1:... that a modern Gnostic disapproved of the essay "In Praise of Polytheism" because he thought it repeated the apostasy of the Roman emperor Julian? Source: Taubes 1983, p. 464, quoted in Gladigow (2001, p. 146) (accusation, in German: "Die Rekurse auf Mythos post Christum sind in Wahrheit nur Wiederholungen der Apostasie Julians") & Styfhals 2019, p. 264 (Taubes as a modern Gnostic; also p. 2: "...Taubes, as a modern Gnostic...")

Improved to Good Article status by Ffranc (talk). Self-nominated at 09:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.