Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Infrastructure Client Group"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
imported>Joseph2302
(reviewed and passed this nomination)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*   -->
+
:* [[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=&#9745;]]<span style="display:none">Y</span><!--template:tick--> Article is long enough (2962 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 2 May, nominated same day), and article is within policy
 +
:* [[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=&#9745;]]<span style="display:none">Y</span><!--template:tick--> Both hooks are short enough, interesting enough (it's an article about construction group, these are the most interesting hooks there), within policy, and well cited
 +
:* [[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=|alt=&#9745;]]<span style="display:none">Y</span><!--template:tick--> QPQ done
 +
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk)]] 15:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:47, 1 June 2020

Infrastructure Client Group

  • ... that members of the Infrastructure Client Group account for 40% of all spending on infrastructure in the United Kingdom? " the UK’s Infrastructure Client Group (ICG) which represents more than 40% of annual UK infrastructure spending." from: "Digital maturity snapshot reveals where industry needs to go next". Infrastructure Intelligence. Retrieved 19 April 2020.

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 16:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC).

  • ☑Y Article is long enough (2962 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 2 May, nominated same day), and article is within policy
  • ☑Y Both hooks are short enough, interesting enough (it's an article about construction group, these are the most interesting hooks there), within policy, and well cited
  • ☑Y QPQ done
  • File:Symbol confirmed.svg Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)