Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ingrid Chua-Go"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(article is indeed considered new by DYK)
imported>Amandajm
(query)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
* You can also make a section at the bottom of the article with the heading '''External links'''.  
 
* You can also make a section at the bottom of the article with the heading '''External links'''.  
  
Unfortunately, I think that the time factor rules this article out as a DYK! [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]]
+
Unfortunately, I think that the time factor rules this article out as a DYK!  
 
[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 
[[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
  
 
:I believe you're misinterpreting the criteria.  As far as I'm concerned, the time criteria for DYK is, for this article, creation within five days '''in mainspace'''.  The article was moved to mainspace by me on February 21, and was nominated the next day.  How is the article not new enough? --[[User:Sky Harbor|<font color="#0066ff" ><b>Sky Harbor</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sky Harbor|<font color="#0066ff" ><b>talk</b></font>]])</sup> 12:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:I believe you're misinterpreting the criteria.  As far as I'm concerned, the time criteria for DYK is, for this article, creation within five days '''in mainspace'''.  The article was moved to mainspace by me on February 21, and was nominated the next day.  How is the article not new enough? --[[User:Sky Harbor|<font color="#0066ff" ><b>Sky Harbor</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sky Harbor|<font color="#0066ff" ><b>talk</b></font>]])</sup> 12:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  Article was clearly moved to mainspace on February 21, which is considered the day it was begun for DYK purposes. As it was self-nominated the day after, it clearly qualifies as new for DYK. A new review is clearly needed, as it is indeed a "newly created" article under DYK rules. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  Article was clearly moved to mainspace on February 21, which is considered the day it was begun for DYK purposes. As it was self-nominated the day after, it clearly qualifies as new for DYK. A new review is clearly needed, as it is indeed a "newly created" article under DYK rules. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)  
 +
 
 +
::I don't comprehend this "mainspace" thing.  Please explain.  When I look at the history of the article, it seems perfectly clear that the greater part of the work was done weeks before it was nominated.  Where was it moved from?  Are you telling me that it wasn't visible until February 21, regardless of when it was created?  [[User:Amandajm|Amandajm]] ([[User talk:Amandajm|talk]]) 00:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:04, 15 March 2013

Ingrid Chua-Go

Filipino society and fashion blogger Ingrid Chua-Go

  • ... that Filipino fashion and society blogger Ingrid Chua-GoTemplate:`s (pictured) fascination with writing was sparked by a toy typewriter her mother gave her as a child?
  • Comment: Article created in User:Kim Guevarra userspace on Jan 3, moved to my userspace on Jan 26. Moved to mainspace on Feb 21.

Created/expanded by I'm Tony Ahn (talk). Self nominated at 05:47, 22 February 2013 (UTC).

  • The first criteria is that an article has been created or substantially expanded in the last five days.
  • The article doesn't fit the very first criteria!
It is new but not new enough!
The article was created on January 26.
It was then slowly expanded over a period of three weeks.
It the sat for another 13 days before it was nominated.
It needed to be nominated in early February to qualify as a "newly created or expanded article".
  • Other than that, it appears to meet all the criteria, being well written. concise, interesting and properly referenced.
  • One issue is that there are two redirects to other websites within the text. These need to be formatted as proper references.
  • You can also make a section at the bottom of the article with the heading External links.

Unfortunately, I think that the time factor rules this article out as a DYK! Amandajm (talk) 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

I believe you're misinterpreting the criteria. As far as I'm concerned, the time criteria for DYK is, for this article, creation within five days in mainspace. The article was moved to mainspace by me on February 21, and was nominated the next day. How is the article not new enough? --Sky Harbor (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png Article was clearly moved to mainspace on February 21, which is considered the day it was begun for DYK purposes. As it was self-nominated the day after, it clearly qualifies as new for DYK. A new review is clearly needed, as it is indeed a "newly created" article under DYK rules. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
I don't comprehend this "mainspace" thing. Please explain. When I look at the history of the article, it seems perfectly clear that the greater part of the work was done weeks before it was nominated. Where was it moved from? Are you telling me that it wasn't visible until February 21, regardless of when it was created? Amandajm (talk) 00:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)