Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Insiang"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
m
imported>Yoninah
(more)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Hahnchen}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Hahnchen}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. A review such as the one above does not qualify for a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
+
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. A review such as the one above does not qualify for a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]]. Your review basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and QPQ. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:28, 17 May 2017

Insiang

5x expanded by Bluesphere (talk). Self-nominated at 16:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Approved with minor alteration to the hook. Premiere implies first screening everywhere. 5x expansion even discounting the plot - which is assumed to be accurately sourced to the subject. - hahnchen 19:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - hahnchen 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. A review such as the one above does not qualify for a QPQ. Your review basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and QPQ. Yoninah (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)