Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Insiang"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(more)
imported>Yoninah
(ce)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Hahnchen}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Hahnchen}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. A review such as the one above does not qualify for a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]]. Your review basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and QPQ. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
+
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] on your part. Best, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:29, 17 May 2017

Insiang

5x expanded by Bluesphere (talk). Self-nominated at 16:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Approved with minor alteration to the hook. Premiere implies first screening everywhere. 5x expansion even discounting the plot - which is assumed to be accurately sourced to the subject. - hahnchen 19:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - hahnchen 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a QPQ on your part. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)