Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Insiang"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(ce)
imported>Hahnchen
(the tick means yes)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] on your part. Best, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
::::*{{ping|Hahnchen}} "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] on your part. Best, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::::I don't want to write out the 5 criteria, which it meets. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 18:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:29, 17 May 2017

Insiang

5x expanded by Bluesphere (talk). Self-nominated at 16:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Approved with minor alteration to the hook. Premiere implies first screening everywhere. 5x expansion even discounting the plot - which is assumed to be accurately sourced to the subject. - hahnchen 19:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
  • It does, else I wouldn't have approved it. - hahnchen 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping "Explicit" means "spell it out". There is a handy Reviewer's Template above every edit window that you can use if you don't want to write out each criteria yourself. The review you wrote above basically mentions just the 5x expansion; it doesn't mention newness, length, neutrality, close paraphrasing, inline hook cite and hook verification, and completion of QPQ. Such a "review" does not qualify as a QPQ on your part. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:25, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I don't want to write out the 5 criteria, which it meets. - hahnchen 18:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)