Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ion Agârbiceanu"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (full review needed) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Approved for DYK) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:* '''ALT1''':... that during the [[interwar period]], [[Romania]]n priest '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was a supporter of [[eugenics]], a largely secular movement? | :* '''ALT1''':... that during the [[interwar period]], [[Romania]]n priest '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was a supporter of [[eugenics]], a largely secular movement? | ||
:* '''ALT2''':... that [[Romania]]n writer '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was made a [[Romanian Senate|Senator]] under the [[National Renaissance Front]] regime, and that the later [[Communist Romania|communist authorities]] granted him two medals? | :* '''ALT2''':... that [[Romania]]n writer '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was made a [[Romanian Senate|Senator]] under the [[National Renaissance Front]] regime, and that the later [[Communist Romania|communist authorities]] granted him two medals? | ||
| − | :* '''ALT3''':... that [[Romania]]n writer '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was | + | :* '''ALT3''':... that [[Romania]]n writer '''[[Ion Agârbiceanu]]''' was influenced in his work by the four years he spent as a parish priest in the [[Apuseni Mountains]]? |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Yunnan nuthatch]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Yunnan nuthatch]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': I didn't start the article, and it's not a 5x expansion, but the article is less than five days old, regardless, and the text is entirely different from what it was before I rewrote it. | :* ''Comment'': I didn't start the article, and it's not a 5x expansion, but the article is less than five days old, regardless, and the text is entirely different from what it was before I rewrote it. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
* {{DYKmake|Ion Agârbiceanu|Biruitorul}} | * {{DYKmake|Ion Agârbiceanu|Biruitorul}} | ||
| + | * {{DYKmake|Ion Agârbiceanu|Dahn}} | ||
| + | * {{DYKmake|Ion Agârbiceanu|Gug01}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
:*ALT3 would be my personal favorite as the hook is easy to understand (and probably since I'm a fan of the outdoors). I think the DYK nom is acceptable by the means that the page is only five days old, but I suppose that someone else should confirm. --<font style="text-shadow:#BD33A4 0em 0em 0.5em,#FF007F -0.4em -0.4em 0.5em,#0247FE 0.3em 0.3em 0.4em">[[User:Gourami Watcher|'''''<span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Gourami</span><span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Watcher</span>''''']][[User talk:Gourami Watcher|<font color=black><sup>'''''(?)'''''</sup>]]</span></font> 15:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | :*ALT3 would be my personal favorite as the hook is easy to understand (and probably since I'm a fan of the outdoors). I think the DYK nom is acceptable by the means that the page is only five days old, but I suppose that someone else should confirm. --<font style="text-shadow:#BD33A4 0em 0em 0.5em,#FF007F -0.4em -0.4em 0.5em,#0247FE 0.3em 0.3em 0.4em">[[User:Gourami Watcher|'''''<span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Gourami</span><span style="color:Blue-Violet;">Watcher</span>''''']][[User talk:Gourami Watcher|<font color=black><sup>'''''(?)'''''</sup>]]</span></font> 15:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. Comments above do not constitute a valid review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC) | + | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. Comments above do not constitute a valid review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This is a new article with three editors involved in its creation and expansion; I have added the names of the other two to the credits. The article is new enough and long enough. I would choose to go for ALT3 which has inline citations for the hook facts (the other hooks are also OK as far as I can see). The article is neutral and no policy issues were found. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 09:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 5 February 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ion Agârbiceanu
- ... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu twice fled advancing Hungarian authorities: in 1916, after the Battle of Transylvania; and in 1940, after the Second Vienna Award?
- ALT1:... that during the interwar period, Romanian priest Ion Agârbiceanu was a supporter of eugenics, a largely secular movement?
- ALT2:... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu was made a Senator under the National Renaissance Front regime, and that the later communist authorities granted him two medals?
- ALT3:... that Romanian writer Ion Agârbiceanu was influenced in his work by the four years he spent as a parish priest in the Apuseni Mountains?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Yunnan nuthatch
- Comment: I didn't start the article, and it's not a 5x expansion, but the article is less than five days old, regardless, and the text is entirely different from what it was before I rewrote it.
5x expanded by Biruitorul (talk). Self nominated at 15:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC).
- ALT3 would be my personal favorite as the hook is easy to understand (and probably since I'm a fan of the outdoors). I think the DYK nom is acceptable by the means that the page is only five days old, but I suppose that someone else should confirm. --GouramiWatcher(?) 15:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed. Comments above do not constitute a valid review. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a new article with three editors involved in its creation and expansion; I have added the names of the other two to the credits. The article is new enough and long enough. I would choose to go for ALT3 which has inline citations for the hook facts (the other hooks are also OK as far as I can see). The article is neutral and no policy issues were found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)