Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Jaba', Jenin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Allen3 (to prep2) |
imported>CommonsDelinker (Removing "Jaba'_general_view.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by Ellin Beltz because: Per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PalestineRemembered.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Jaba', Jenin|Jaba', Jenin}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Jaba', Jenin|Jaba', Jenin}} | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
| − | {{main page image|image= | + | {{main page image|image=|caption=General view of Jaba'}} |
</div> | </div> | ||
* ... that the mountainous [[Palestinian people|Palestinian]] village of '''[[Jaba', Jenin|Jaba']]''' ''(pictured)'' served as the [[throne village]] of the [[Jarrar clan]]? | * ... that the mountainous [[Palestinian people|Palestinian]] village of '''[[Jaba', Jenin|Jaba']]''' ''(pictured)'' served as the [[throne village]] of the [[Jarrar clan]]? | ||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 15 May 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jaba', Jenin
[[File:|Script error: No such module "If empty".px |General view of Jaba' ]]
General view of Jaba'
- ... that the mountainous Palestinian village of Jaba' (pictured) served as the throne village of the Jarrar clan?
- Reviewed: Bean Boots
5x expanded by Al Ameer son (talk) and Huldra (talk). Nominated by Al Ameer son (talk) at 23:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC).
Expansion is from 258 characters to 9426 characters, enough to qualify. The article is neutral and adequately sourced. Copyvios confidence 21.3%. The hook provided is short enough, neutral and interesting enough, and supported by the citation provided. The image is on Commons, has a valid OTRS ticket, and is used in the article. QPQ still needs to be done. sst✈discuss 18:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks for the review. QPQ finished. --Al Ameer (talk) 03:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)