Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/James Harvey Insole"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>RLO1729
(replied)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Promoted to Prep 2)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from April 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=April 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]])&nbsp;05:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|James Harvey Insole}}
 
{{DYK header|James Harvey Insole}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=James Harvey Insole|James Harvey Insole}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=James Harvey Insole|James Harvey Insole}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the modern legacy of [[South Wales]] [[coal mining|colliery]] proprietor '''[[James Harvey Insole]]''' (1821–1901) is his [[Victorian architecture|Victorian]] mansion [[Insole Court]] at [[Llandaff]], [[Wales]]? <small>Source: Citation following this statement in the [[James Harvey Insole|article lead section]].</small>
 
* ... that the modern legacy of [[South Wales]] [[coal mining|colliery]] proprietor '''[[James Harvey Insole]]''' (1821–1901) is his [[Victorian architecture|Victorian]] mansion [[Insole Court]] at [[Llandaff]], [[Wales]]? <small>Source: Citation following this statement in the [[James Harvey Insole|article lead section]].</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': 6th DYK nomination, 1 reviewed ([[Kuiil]])
 
:* ''Reviewed'': 6th DYK nomination, 1 reviewed ([[Kuiil]])
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:RLO1729|RLO1729]] ([[User talk:RLO1729|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:RLO1729|RLO1729]] ([[User talk:RLO1729|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|James Harvey Insole|RLO1729|subpage=James Harvey Insole}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article reached GA-status in due time. It is long enough, and cites sources inline. The pretty high rated text similarty reported by "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" comes from quotes. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. Hokk fact is cited inline. Attention: QPQ was used twice, second time for [[Template:Did you know nominations/George Insole|George Insole]]. Good to go. [[User talk:CeeGee|CeeGee]] 10:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article reached GA-status in due time. It is long enough, and cites sources inline. The pretty high rated text similarty reported by "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" comes from quotes. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. Hokk fact is cited inline. Attention: QPQ was used twice, second time for [[Template:Did you know nominations/George Insole|George Insole]]. Good to go. [[User talk:CeeGee|CeeGee]] 10:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  
::* Great, thanks. (QPQ not being claimed twice, only for this one. Just pointing out in the George Insole DYK nomination, which was made before this one, that it was still within the five DYKs allowed initially as well as having one review in hand at that stage.)<span style="font-family:Georgia">&nbsp;&nbsp;~&nbsp;'''[[User:RLO1729|RLO1729]]'''<sup>[[User talk:RLO1729#top|&#128172;]]</sup></span> 10:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)  
+
::* Great, thanks. (QPQ not being claimed twice, only for this one. Just pointing out in the George Insole DYK nomination, which was made before this one, that it was still within the five DYKs allowed initially as well as having one review in hand at that stage.)<span style="font-family:Georgia">&nbsp;&nbsp;~&nbsp;'''[[User:RLO1729|RLO1729]]'''<sup>[[User talk:RLO1729#top|&#128172;]]</sup></span> 10:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 05:40, 27 April 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

James Harvey Insole

  • Reviewed: 6th DYK nomination, 1 reviewed (Kuiil)

Improved to Good Article status by RLO1729 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Article reached GA-status in due time. It is long enough, and cites sources inline. The pretty high rated text similarty reported by "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" comes from quotes. The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit. Hokk fact is cited inline. Attention: QPQ was used twice, second time for George Insole. Good to go. CeeGee 10:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Great, thanks. (QPQ not being claimed twice, only for this one. Just pointing out in the George Insole DYK nomination, which was made before this one, that it was still within the five DYKs allowed initially as well as having one review in hand at that stage.)  ~ RLO1729💬 10:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)