Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Jan van Beers (artist)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (rm nl)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(OK)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that '''[[Jan van Beers (artist)|Jan van Beers]]''' was largely unknown until the scandal of being accused of painting over a photograph brought him worldwide fame?
+
* ... that '''[[Jan van Beers (artist)|Jan van Beers]]''' ''(caricatured)'' was largely unknown until the scandal of being accused of painting over a photograph brought him worldwide fame?
  
* '''ALT1'''... that '''[[Jan van Beers (artist)|Jan van Beers]]''' was largely unknown until in 1881, three critics mistook his miniature [[Hyperrealism (visual arts)|hyperrealist]] style for painting over a photograph, and the resulting attention brought him worldwide fame?
+
*<s> '''ALT1'''... that '''[[Jan van Beers (artist)|Jan van Beers]]''' was largely unknown until in 1881, three critics mistook his miniature [[Hyperrealism (visual arts)|hyperrealist]] style for painting over a photograph, and the resulting attention brought him worldwide fame?</s>
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->
Line 27: Line 27:
 
:* Mostly good. Two bits that could use explicit citations (I've marked them) and then I think it's good to go. Phrasing of hook could possibly be improved, but is accurate and sourced. Once the {{cn}} tags are fixed, and, ideally, "scandal of being accused" be rewritten, it's good to go. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup></span> 22:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 
:* Mostly good. Two bits that could use explicit citations (I've marked them) and then I think it's good to go. Phrasing of hook could possibly be improved, but is accurate and sourced. Once the {{cn}} tags are fixed, and, ideally, "scandal of being accused" be rewritten, it's good to go. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup></span> 22:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 
::* Citations have been added, and I've added an ALT1 attempt at a revised hook. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 10:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 
::* Citations have been added, and I've added an ALT1 attempt at a revised hook. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 10:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article seems to me to now qualify for DYK in that it is new enough and long enough and sufficiently referenced. I prefer the original hook and it is properly cited. The image is in the public domain and I have added the word ''(caricatured)'' to the hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 20:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:37, 21 March 2014

Jan van Beers (artist)

1891 Vanity Fair caricature

  • ... that Jan van Beers (caricatured) was largely unknown until the scandal of being accused of painting over a photograph brought him worldwide fame?
  • ALT1... that Jan van Beers was largely unknown until in 1881, three critics mistook his miniature hyperrealist style for painting over a photograph, and the resulting attention brought him worldwide fame?

Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 00:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Mostly good. Two bits that could use explicit citations (I've marked them) and then I think it's good to go. Phrasing of hook could possibly be improved, but is accurate and sourced. Once the[citation needed] tags are fixed, and, ideally, "scandal of being accused" be rewritten, it's good to go. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Citations have been added, and I've added an ALT1 attempt at a revised hook. Edwardx (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article seems to me to now qualify for DYK in that it is new enough and long enough and sufficiently referenced. I prefer the original hook and it is properly cited. The image is in the public domain and I have added the word (caricatured) to the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)