Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Japanese ironclad Kongō"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sturmvogel 66 (←Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Japanese ironclad Kongō | article2 = | status = expanded | hook = ... that the '''[...') |
imported>I JethroBT (Looks good, but I have question about the hook's source.) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] 5x expansion confirmed from roughly 225 words to over 1300 words. Length OK, a spot check of a few sources using snippet views on books shows no signs of obvious plagiarism or close paraphrasing. QPQ checks out, image is in the public domain due to the age of the photograph. Hook is below the limit and is interesting. Can I ask, in relation to the hook, what the source ''Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships'' is exactly? I see a subscription is required and an e-mail address provided to subscribe; is the source some kind of book or trade publication, a website, or something else? If there is no website dedicated to the source, how were you able to obtain the e-mail address exactly? [[User:I JethroBT|<font color="green" face="Candara"><b>I, JethroBT</b></font>]][[User talk:I JethroBT| <sup>drop me a line</sup>]] 02:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 02:44, 17 September 2013
DYK toolbox |
---|
Japanese ironclad Kongō
- ... that the Japanese ironclad Kongō (pictured) was one of the two ships that returned the survivors of the wrecked Ottoman frigate Ertuğrul to Turkey in 1891?
- Reviewed: Tachikawa air disaster
5x expanded by Sturmvogel 66 (talk). Self nominated at 00:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC).
5x expansion confirmed from roughly 225 words to over 1300 words. Length OK, a spot check of a few sources using snippet views on books shows no signs of obvious plagiarism or close paraphrasing. QPQ checks out, image is in the public domain due to the age of the photograph. Hook is below the limit and is interesting. Can I ask, in relation to the hook, what the source Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships is exactly? I see a subscription is required and an e-mail address provided to subscribe; is the source some kind of book or trade publication, a website, or something else? If there is no website dedicated to the source, how were you able to obtain the e-mail address exactly? I, JethroBT drop me a line 02:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)