Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Jimmy Kimmel Live! controversy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ritchie333 (not a chance) |
imported>Newyorkbrad (absolutely not) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] I was considering giving this a chance but then I saw the ANI discussion here. There are three problems. 1) The title of the article is way too divisive. 2) The hook should mention that this was never a serious proposal. 3) I believe this violates the creator's topic ban on race-related articles. --[[User:King jakob c 2|Jakob]] <small>([[User talk:King jakob c 2|Scream about]] [[Special:Contributions/King jakob c 2|the things I've broken]])</small> 15:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] I was considering giving this a chance but then I saw the ANI discussion here. There are three problems. 1) The title of the article is way too divisive. 2) The hook should mention that this was never a serious proposal. 3) I believe this violates the creator's topic ban on race-related articles. --[[User:King jakob c 2|Jakob]] <small>([[User talk:King jakob c 2|Scream about]] [[Special:Contributions/King jakob c 2|the things I've broken]])</small> 15:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
:*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Hook is a blatant falsification of sources - it was an immature comment offered by a six year old on live television. Article title is needlessly offensive (I have renamed it to [[Jimmy Kimmel Live! controversy]], though I will support anyone sending it to AfD). [[User:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F">'''Ritchie333'''</font>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(cont)</sup></font>]] 15:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Hook is a blatant falsification of sources - it was an immature comment offered by a six year old on live television. Article title is needlessly offensive (I have renamed it to [[Jimmy Kimmel Live! controversy]], though I will support anyone sending it to AfD). [[User:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F">'''Ritchie333'''</font>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<font color="#7F007F"><sup>(cont)</sup></font>]] 15:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :*Absolutely not. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 22:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 14 November 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
We should kill everyone in China
- ... that killing everyone in China has been proposed as a method to solve the United States' debt crisis?
Created by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 12:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC).
How much of this article is new, and how much was just split off from the main Jimmy Kimmel Live! article? Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I was considering giving this a chance but then I saw the ANI discussion here. There are three problems. 1) The title of the article is way too divisive. 2) The hook should mention that this was never a serious proposal. 3) I believe this violates the creator's topic ban on race-related articles. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 15:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Hook is a blatant falsification of sources - it was an immature comment offered by a six year old on live television. Article title is needlessly offensive (I have renamed it to Jimmy Kimmel Live! controversy, though I will support anyone sending it to AfD). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)- Absolutely not. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)