Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Joe Childs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bcp67 (initial review) |
imported>Bcp67 (more) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:* <!--Make first comment here--> | :* <!--Make first comment here--> | ||
| − | Hook looks slightly long at 376 chars, and also refers to Cavalry Regiments of the British Army, rather than the specific regiment that Childs donated to (4th Hussars) - could this be changed? Otherwise looks good - the hook checks out with the cite (I have the same book so was able to verify it), article is sufficiently long, verifiable and new enough. --[[User:Bcp67|Bcp67]] ([[User talk:Bcp67|talk]]) 11:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | + | *Hook looks slightly long at 376 chars, and also refers to Cavalry Regiments of the British Army, rather than the specific regiment that Childs donated to (4th Hussars) - could this be changed? Otherwise looks good - the hook checks out with the cite (I have the same book so was able to verify it), article is sufficiently long, verifiable and new enough. --[[User:Bcp67|Bcp67]] ([[User talk:Bcp67|talk]]) 11:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
| + | :Not sure about the image though and would appreciate some comment from a more experienced DYK reviewer. --[[User:Bcp67|Bcp67]] ([[User talk:Bcp67|talk]]) 11:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 11 May 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Joe Childs
- ... that Joe Childs (pictured) rode Gainsborough to win the British Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing in 1918, and donated his riding fees for the year to the British Army's cavalry?
Created by Peaky76 (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 10:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC).
- Hook looks slightly long at 376 chars, and also refers to Cavalry Regiments of the British Army, rather than the specific regiment that Childs donated to (4th Hussars) - could this be changed? Otherwise looks good - the hook checks out with the cite (I have the same book so was able to verify it), article is sufficiently long, verifiable and new enough. --Bcp67 (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)